Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/enm-kes/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2025-05.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 100 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 101
Department of Endocrinology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Copyright © 2021 Korean Endocrine Society
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Use more strict selection criteria: The study should include hypothyroid patients on a stable dose of LT4 for at least 6 months, with persistent symptoms and a normal serum TSH level, in whom associated autoimmune comorbidities have been ruled out. I would exclude patients who initially were treated because of subclinical hypothyroidism, as treatment is unlikely to improve their symptoms [52]. This probably means excluding patients who used <1.2 μg/kg/day LT4 as recommended by the consensus panel [75].
Choose a randomized, double-blind, parallel study design: The double-blind design should be ensured by having placebo pills besides the LT4 pills in the T4 monotherapy arm. A crossover study design has the inherent risk of a carry-over effect. The duration of the intervention should be sufficiently long (≥6 months), because we do not know how long it will take before tissue T3 content is normalized.
Calculate the sample size: It should be high enough to allow a subanalysis between carriers of specific polymorphisms (e.g., DIO2, MCT8, MCT10, OATP1C1) and noncarriers [76, 77]. One should therefore know the prevalence of these polymorphisms. The Ala/Ala genotype of the DIO2 Thr92Ala polymorphism is present in 11% of both LT4 users and the general population, although without effects on differences in thyroid hormone parameters, health-related QoL, and cognitive functioning [78]. It could be difficult to achieve the required large sample size. In Norwegian women in the period from 1995–1997 to 2006–2008, the prevalence of untreated overt hypothyroidism decreased by 84% (from 0.75% to 0.16%) and that of untreated subclinical hypothyroidism decreased by 64% (from 3.0% to 1.1%), whereas that of treated hypothyroidism increased by 60% (from 5.0% to 8.0%); the prevalence of any form of hypothyroidism remained essentially similar (9% in women and 3% in men) [79].
Calculate T4 and T3 dosages of combination treatment: This is a controversial area. Consensus exists that the daily T3 dose should be split into two administrations (as long as a slow-release T3 preparation is not available). Some physicians just replace part of the usual T4 dose by T3 at a substitution ratio of 3:1 (e.g., 25 μg of T4 is replaced by 7.5 μg of T3) [80]. A daily dose of 150 μg of T4 during monotherapy would thus be transferred into 125 μg of T4+7.5 μg of T3 during combination therapy (i.e., a dose ratio of 17:1). I prefer this dose ratio, which is closest to the physiological T4 to T3 secretion ratio of 16:1 by the thyroid gland itself [81]. Most studies in the literature used lower T4:T3 dose ratios, in the order of 5:1 to 10:1, which might be more effective but also liable to more side effects [1]. Adaptation of the combination dosage should be considered if serum TSH values are encountered outside the reference range. It makes sense not to change T4 and T3 doses simultaneously; the ETA guidelines recommend to adapt first the daily T3 dose [1]. Maintenance of a normal serum TSH level is prudent because two large independent population studies over the past 2 years have shown that mortality of hypothyroid patients treated with LT4 is increased when the serum TSH exceeds or is reduced outside the normal reference range [82]. Residual thyroid function (RTF) might be a key factor in the success of combination therapy. A recent algorithm estimates RTF and then optimizes T4+T3 dosages, resulting in T4:T3 dose ratios of 8:1 to 13:1 with escalating RTF [83].
Define primary and secondary outcomes: It would be advantageous if RCTs would use the same primary outcome. A suitable candidate is the thyroid-specific and well-validated QoL questionnaire, the ThyPRO [84]. This patient-reported outcome instrument consists of 84 items summarized in 13 scales; each item is rated on a 0–4 Likert scale to yield thirteen 0–100 scales, with higher scores indicating worse health status. The scores for each scale are nicely visualized on a ThyPRO radar plot. The ThyPRO has good cross-cultural validity; the shortened ThyPRO-39, which is now available in many languages, might be preferred [41,85]. A secondary outcome should be patient preference for monotherapy or combination therapy. A variety of biologic markers, including metabolic, cardiovascular, cognitive, and musculoskeletal parameters, can also be recorded.
Incorporate safety precautions: Hyperthyroid symptoms, tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and decreased bone density and fractures would all be relevant, and should be assessed [75]. Fortunately, it is possible using T4+T3 combination therapy to keep serum TSH, FT4, and FT3 within their normal range in ≥90% of patients [86]. Observational studies lasting 9 to 17 years found no increased risk of cardiovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, or fractures in patients using T3 compared to patients using T4 [87,88]. The use of LT3 did not lead to increased breast cancer or any cancer incidence and mortality compared with LT4 use [89]. There was only an increased incident use of antipsychotic medication during follow-up in T3 users [87].
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Country | Period | Prevalence of overt hypothyroidism, % | Prevalence subclinical hypothyroidism, % |
---|---|---|---|
USA [11] | 1988–1994 | 0.3 | 4.6 |
USA [12] | 1995 | 0.4 | 8.5 |
Europe [13] | 1975–2012 | 0.6 | 4.6 |
Europe [14] | 2008–2018 | 0.6 | 4.1 |
Spain [15] | 2009–2010 | 0.3 | 4.6 |
Japan [16] | 2005–2006 | 0.7 | 5.8 |
Korea [17,18] | 2013–2015 | 0.7 | 3.1 |
Country | Responders, n (%) | T4 drug of choice, %a | T4+T3 use considered, %b | GDP 2019 per capita in $ (% of world’s average)c |
---|---|---|---|---|
Italy [33] | 797 (39) | 99 | 43 | 35,614 (282) |
Denmark [34] | 152 (31) | 94 | 59 | 65,147 (516) |
Romania [35] | 316 (42) | 99 | 39 | 12,131 (96) |
Poland [36] | 423 (55) | 96 | 32 | 17,387 (138) |
Bulgaria [37] | 120 (95) | 96 | 24 | 9,026 (71) |
THESIS, Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: an International Survey; T4, thyroxine; T3, triiodothyronine; GDP, gross domestic product.
a Preference at initiation of thyroid hormone replacement therapy;
b Combination therapy considered for use in patients with persistent symptoms despite a normal thyroid stimulating hormone on levothyroxine;
c GDP per capita in 2019 in US dollars, with % of world’s average GDP in parentheses (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD).
Country | Frequency of persistent symptoms as estimated by respondents, % | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
<5% | 6%–10% | 11%–30% | >30% | Not sure | |
Denmark [34] | 23.0 | 37.5 | 1.3 | 11.2 | 27 |
Romania [35] | 46.9 | 37.9 | - | - | - |
Poland [36] | 33.1 | 28.8 | - | - | - |
Bulgaria [37] | 41.7 | 34.2 | 6.6 | 2.5 | 15 |
Country | Changes in frequency of persistent symptoms despite a normal TSH over the last 5 years as estimated by respondents | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Increase last 5 yr, % | No change last 5 yr, % | Decrease last 5 yr, % | Not sure, % | |
Denmark [34] | 58.6 | 13.8 | 6.6 | 21.1 |
Romania [35] | - | 31.8 | 24.1 | - |
Poland [36] | 36.4 | 28.1 | - | - |
Bulgaria [37] | 26.6 | 35.0 | 14.2 | 24.2 |
Possible cause of persistent symptoms despite a normal TSH on LT4 | Proportion of respondentsb | |
---|---|---|
(Strongly) agree, % | (Strongly) disagree, % | |
Inability of LT4 to restore physiology | 12–20 | 53–63 |
Psychosocial factors | 67–82 | 3–14 |
Comorbidities | 42–85 | 5–16 |
Chronic fatigue syndrome | 24–77 | 7–21 |
Patient unrealistic expectation | 58–72 | 6–19 |
Inflammation due to autoimmunity | 15–48 | 20–41 |
Burden of chronic disease | 40–85 | 2–24 |
Burden of having to take medication | 30–44 | 15–26 |
Country | Period | Prevalence of overt hypothyroidism, % | Prevalence subclinical hypothyroidism, % |
---|---|---|---|
USA [11] | 1988–1994 | 0.3 | 4.6 |
USA [12] | 1995 | 0.4 | 8.5 |
Europe [13] | 1975–2012 | 0.6 | 4.6 |
Europe [14] | 2008–2018 | 0.6 | 4.1 |
Spain [15] | 2009–2010 | 0.3 | 4.6 |
Japan [16] | 2005–2006 | 0.7 | 5.8 |
Korea [17,18] | 2013–2015 | 0.7 | 3.1 |
Country | Responders, n (%) | T4 drug of choice, % |
T4+T3 use considered, % |
GDP 2019 per capita in $ (% of world’s average) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Italy [33] | 797 (39) | 99 | 43 | 35,614 (282) |
Denmark [34] | 152 (31) | 94 | 59 | 65,147 (516) |
Romania [35] | 316 (42) | 99 | 39 | 12,131 (96) |
Poland [36] | 423 (55) | 96 | 32 | 17,387 (138) |
Bulgaria [37] | 120 (95) | 96 | 24 | 9,026 (71) |
Country | Frequency of persistent symptoms as estimated by respondents, % | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
<5% | 6%–10% | 11%–30% | >30% | Not sure | |
Denmark [34] | 23.0 | 37.5 | 1.3 | 11.2 | 27 |
Romania [35] | 46.9 | 37.9 | - | - | - |
Poland [36] | 33.1 | 28.8 | - | - | - |
Bulgaria [37] | 41.7 | 34.2 | 6.6 | 2.5 | 15 |
Country | Changes in frequency of persistent symptoms despite a normal TSH over the last 5 years as estimated by respondents | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Increase last 5 yr, % | No change last 5 yr, % | Decrease last 5 yr, % | Not sure, % | |
Denmark [34] | 58.6 | 13.8 | 6.6 | 21.1 |
Romania [35] | - | 31.8 | 24.1 | - |
Poland [36] | 36.4 | 28.1 | - | - |
Bulgaria [37] | 26.6 | 35.0 | 14.2 | 24.2 |
Symptom | Main symptom, % | Prevalence, % |
---|---|---|
Being tired | 27 | 91 |
Lack of energy | 17 | 87 |
Cognitive problems | 11 | 83 |
Musculoskeletal symptoms | 10 | 76 |
Weight problems | 8 | 75 |
Pain | 4 | 49 |
Diffuse symptoms | 4 | 48 |
Depression | 2 | 39 |
Constipation | 2 | 42 |
Sweating | 0.3 | 31 |
Other | 15 | 36 |
Possible cause of persistent symptoms despite a normal TSH on LT4 | Proportion of respondents | |
---|---|---|
(Strongly) agree, % | (Strongly) disagree, % | |
Inability of LT4 to restore physiology | 12–20 | 53–63 |
Psychosocial factors | 67–82 | 3–14 |
Comorbidities | 42–85 | 5–16 |
Chronic fatigue syndrome | 24–77 | 7–21 |
Patient unrealistic expectation | 58–72 | 6–19 |
Inflammation due to autoimmunity | 15–48 | 20–41 |
Burden of chronic disease | 40–85 | 2–24 |
Burden of having to take medication | 30–44 | 15–26 |
THESIS, Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: an International Survey; T4, thyroxine; T3, triiodothyronine; GDP, gross domestic product. Preference at initiation of thyroid hormone replacement therapy; Combination therapy considered for use in patients with persistent symptoms despite a normal thyroid stimulating hormone on levothyroxine; GDP
TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone; LT4, levothyroxine; THESIS, Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: an International Survey.
TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone; THESIS, Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: an International Survey.
LT4, levothyroxine; T4, thyroxine; T3, triiodothyronine.
TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone; LT4, levothyroxine; THESIS, Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: an International Survey. Respondents from Denmark [ Figures indicate range (lowest %–highest %) of respondents’ answers.