Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/enm-kes/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2025-07.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 100 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 101 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the Localization of Pituitary Tumors in Cushing’s Disease
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Endocrinol Metab : Endocrinology and Metabolism

clarivate
OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Endocrinol Metab > Ahead-of print > Article
Original Article
68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the Localization of Pituitary Tumors in Cushing’s Disease
Kyungwon Kim1orcid, Dongwoo Kim2, Min-Ho Lee3, Yae Won Park4, Sung Soo Ahn4, Ju Hyung Moon5, Eui Hyun Kim5, Sun Ho Kim5, Cheol Ryong Ku1orcid, Eun Jig Lee1orcid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2024.2249
Published online: March 18, 2025

1Endocrinology, Institute of Endocrine Research, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

3University of Medicine and Health Sciences, New York, NY, USA

4Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

5Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding authors: Cheol Ryong Ku Endocrinology, Institute of Endocrine Research, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea Tel: +82-2-2228-0833, Fax: +82-2-312-0578, E-mail: CR079@yuhs.ac
Eun Jig Lee Endocrinology, Institute of Endocrine Research, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea Tel: +82-2-2228-0833, Fax: +82-2-312-0578, E-mail: ejlee423@yuhs.ac
• Received: November 20, 2024   • Revised: January 13, 2025   • Accepted: January 21, 2025

Copyright © 2025 Korean Endocrine Society

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 815 Views
  • 45 Download
  • Background
    This study aimed to determine the value of 68Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in localizing adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting pituitary adenomas.
  • Methods
    In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 30 patients with Cushing’s disease and positive ACTH immunoreactivity. All patients underwent 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and pituitary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before transsphenoidal adenomectomy.
  • Results
    Twenty-five patients showed 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake in their pituitary glands on PET/CT. Median age, pre-operative ACTH levels, pre-operative cortisol, and tumor size on MRI were comparable irrespective of DOTATOC uptake. 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT showed a 77% success rate for localizing adenomas, which was not statistically different from that of MRI. The ACTH level in the successful localization group was significantly higher than that in the failed group (84.41 pg/mL vs. 37.26 pg/mL, P=0.001). The ACTH level was statistically significant predictor of successful localization using 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT (P=0.013). The area under the curve was 0.932 with a cutoff of 53.86 pg/mL for ACTH levels to determine successful localization. Pre-operative ACTH levels above 53.86 pg/mL showed the best diagnostic accuracy in predicting the success of localizing adenomas (sensitivity, 91.3%; specificity, 85.7%). Mean and maximum standardized uptake value of adenoma negatively correlated to pre-operative ACTH level.
  • Conclusion
    Plasma ACTH level is a favorable predictor for the successful localization and negative correlation with 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake of corticotroph adenomas in 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT did not improve tumor localization for Cushing’s disease compared with MRI alone.
Cushing’s disease (CD), the most common cause of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome, is caused by adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting pituitary tumors [1,2]. To achieve the best results for patients, precise diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and careful management of the disease and its related comorbidities are required [3]. The localization of ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors is paramount as definitive management mainly involves surgical resection of the tumors. Most of these tumors are microadenomas, and their diagnosis relies on specialized imaging of the sellar and parasellar regions. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the investigation of choice, approximately 50% of microadenomas in CD are clearly visible on standard 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI and most lesions are very small [4]. Although higher resolution techniques can increase the chances of detecting very tiny lesions, they are not available in most clinics and the protocol is not standardized yet. In this context, functional imaging can help confirm the presence or location of suspected lesions.
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been explored as an alternative to or modality to be combined with MRI for the localization of corticotroph adenomas. 18Fluoro-deoxy-glucose PET/CT has a limited role in the diagnosis of CD, but corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation can increase its success rate [5]. 11C-methionine can permit more accurate localization of primary lesions [6]. PET/CT using the somatostatin analog 68gallium-DOTATOC (68Ga-DOTATOC) has shown good efficacy in the accurate localization and assessment of the functional status of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), providing good resolution and spatial orientation. Although corticotropic adenomas express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), the performance of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in assessing CD is not well-known [7].
In this study, we focused on the performance of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT as a tool for localizing ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors and tried to determine the patients with CD who would be suitable candidates for the adjunctive use of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET scans.
Subjects
Thirty patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients underwent surgical resection of the pituitary tumor through transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSA) at Severance Hospital between 2015 and 2019 and had histologically proven CD with positive ACTH immunoreactivity. All patients underwent 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and pituitary MRI before surgery. Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) was also attempted for all patients, but catheterization was failed in five cases.
The disease diagnosis was based on international criteria [4]. None of the patients were taking glucocorticoids. Moreover, the final diagnosis was confirmed using surgical pathology and clinical follow-up.
The data were collected under the conditions of regular clinical care with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital, and the requirement for written informed consent was waived owing to our study’s retrospective design (IRB No.4-2020-0414).
Hormonal assessment
Basal plasma cortisol and ACTH levels were measured at 8:00 AM before surgery. The ACTH levels were measured using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Cortisol levels and 24-hour urine free cortisol (UFC) were measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA).
An 8:00 AM plasma cortisol concentration higher than 1.8 µg/dL, after 1 mg dexamethasone had been administered at midnight, was considered a positive result in the overnight dexamethasone suppression test (ON DST) [4,8]. Moreover, a plasma cortisol level reduced by less than 50% of the original level after 6-hourly 2 mg dexamethasone had been administered for 2 days was considered as suppression in the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test (HD DST) [8].
68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT protocol
Approximately 122 MBq (3.3 mCi) of 68Ga-DOTATOC was administered intravenously. Sixty minutes after intravenous injection of 68Ga-DOTATOC, scanning was performed using a dedicated PET/CT scanner (Discovery 600, General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with a spiral CT scan for attenuation correction with a 0.5 second rotation time at 60 mA, 120 kVp, and 5.0 mm section thickness. PET scan of the head were then acquired for 3 minutes per bed position in the three-dimensional mode. The PET images were reconstructed using an ordered-subset expectation-maximization algorithm (two iterations and 16 subsets) with attenuation, random, scatter, and decay corrections. The PET/CT images were reviewed and analyzed by two nuclear medicine physicians based on a consensus.
68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT interpretation
The PET/CT images were visually evaluated by two experienced specialists independently in the Department of Nuclear Medicine (Dongwoo Kim, with 5 years of experience; Eung-Hyuck Cho with over 10 years of experience). Each specialist independently interpreted the 68Ga-DOTATOC PET images twice, with a 2-week interval between readings to minimize recall bias. The images were presented in a randomized order, and specialists were blinded to clinical and other imaging data. The interpretation was based on a visual assessment of uptake patterns, where regions of increased or decreased tracer uptake relative to the surrounding background tissue were considered abnormal. In case of disagreement, the two readers reached a consensus again and presented the result.
The region of interest (ROI) was delineated using MIM software version 6.5 (Software Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA). The pituitary gland was identified, and a circular ROI with a fixed diameter of 3 mm was drawn for all patients. This ROI was placed over the suspected lesion. For normal pituitary glands, the same 3 mm ROI was used. The mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for both pituitary adenomas and normal pituitary glands were automatically measured using MIM version 6.5. The SUV for the volume of interest was calculated as follows: [decay-corrected activity (kBq)/volume (mL)]/[injected dose (kBq)/body weight (g)].
MRI evaluation
All patients underwent pre-operative dynamic MRI of the sellar region using 3.0T MR units (Achieva, Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). Axial T2-weighted, high-resolution coronal T2-weighted image, and delayed gadolinium-enhanced coronal T1-weighted MRI were performed. All MRI images were reviewed using a Picture Archive Communication System (PACS). The extent, location, and size of the pituitary tumors were reviewed by two radiologists. Two skilled radiologists (Yae Won Park and Sung Soo Ahn; both with over 10 years of experience) independently assessed the MRI images visually. Their objective was to evaluate whether the MRI images exhibited a ‘negative’ or ‘positive’ result for pituitary adenoma, along with the precise location, if present.
The maximal diameter of the adenoma was defined on the coronal and sagittal planes and measured manually. Pituitary adenomas were classified as microadenomas (<10 mm) or macroadenomas (≥10 mm) based on their maximal diameters. Tumoral invasions were evaluated by the modified Knosp classification based on MRI images [9,10].
BIPSS protocol
All the BIPSS procedures were conducted prior to TSAs. Catheterization was performed via a unilateral femoral venous approach [11]. After correct catheter placement, simultaneous blood samplings of 3 mL were obtained from the periphery (P) as well as the left and right inferior petrosal sinus (IPS). After sampling, CRH at a dose of 1 µg/kg was administered and further P and IPS samples were drawn after 5 and 10 minutes. Before each sample was drawn, the catheters were aspirated, and saline-diluted blood was discarded. All the samples were delivered on ice for ACTH and prolactin measurement.
A ratio of IPS:P prolactin ≥1.8 was determined as an indicator of successful catheterization. We interpreted that a prolactin-normalized ACTH IPS:P ratio: (1) <0.8 suggested ectopic cushing syndrome and (2) ≥1.3 indicated CD [12]. An intersinus ACTH ratio of ≥1.4 was used for the lateralization of pituitary adenomas [12,13].
Statistical analysis
Values were expressed as medians (range). The Mann–Whitney U test was used to evaluate the differences between the groups for clinical indicators without normal distribution. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical data.
Interobserver agreement regarding image analysis was evaluated with kappa (κ) statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Kappa values were indicated as follows: less than 0.20, poor agreement; 0.21–0.40, fair agreement; 0.41–0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80, good agreement; and greater than 0.81, excellent agreement. ICC results were interpreted according to the following criteria: poor (ICC <0.50), moderate (ICC=0.50–0.74), good (ICC=0.75–0.90), and excellent (ICC>0.90) [14].
To evaluate the independent predictors of success rates for tumor localization, we used binary logistic regression analysis. We measured the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the accuracy of pre-operative ACTH as a tool for determining the success of localization. The Youden index, a function of sensitivity and specificity, was calculated to identify the optimal cutoff point. The index ranges from 0 to 1, where a value closer to 1 indicates better performance of the test in distinguishing between conditions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.
Patients’ characteristics
The baseline characteristics of the patients included in this study are shown in Table 1. The median age of the 30 patients at diagnosis was 34 years (range, 15 to 68). Most patients were women (77%). The median adenoma size measured by MRI was 8.50 mm (range, 3.00 to 72.00). Eleven adenomas were macroadenomas and 19 were microadenomas. Moreover, 20 tumors showed no cavernous sinus invasion.
We classified the patients into two groups depending on focal pituitary DOTATOC uptake on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and compared their baseline characteristics (Table 1). We defined the DOTATOC uptake group as those who showed focal difference of DOTATOC uptake compared to adjacent tissues on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and the no-uptake group as those who did not. We presented DOTATOC images in Fig. 1. Five patients had no DOTATOC uptake on PET/CT images, although their tumors were pathologically confirmed. All members of the no-uptake group were female. The 24-hour UFC, pre-operative ACTH, and pre-operative cortisol levels were higher in the DOTATOC uptake group compared with the no-uptake group, but this difference was not statistically significant (694.60 µg/day vs. 456.20 µg/day, 84.30 pg/mL vs. 50.87 pg/mL, and 20.60 µg/dL vs. 17.90 µg/dL, respectively).
Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, MRI, and BIPSS in CD
We compared the success rates of localizing adenomas using 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, MRI, and BIPSS, based on the location of adenomas identified by surgeons following TSA. All surgically identified adenomas were positive for ACTH immunoreactivity.
The interobserver agreement for localizing adenomas was 0.903 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.776 to 1.030) for DOTATOC PET/CT and 0.946 (95% CI, 0.842 to 1.050) for sellar MRI, confirming excellent interobserver agreement. The intraobserver agreement was also confirmed to be above 0.9, and the results were judged reliable. MRI, which is the standard for diagnosis, successfully localized pituitary tumors in 90.00% of patients with CD. In comparison, 77% of PET and 68% of BIPSS were successful in localizing tumors. The success rates of these three methods were not statistically different for the localization of ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors (P=0.127). For microadenomas, MRI showed a success rate of 84% for localization compared to 74% with 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and 63% with BIPSS (P=0.401).
Regarding MRI, the success rate of localization was 100% for macroadenomas but decreased to 84% for microadenomas. This difference was not statistically significant (P=0.239) (Table 2). 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and BIPSS did not show differences in the success rates of localizing macroadenomas and microadenomas.
False-positive cases for localizing corticotroph adenomas on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT
The qualitative analysis of tumor localization for CD is presented in Table 3. There were two cases with false-positive DOTATOC uptake for pituitary adenoma localization in our study.
The first case (case 29) had a T2 hyperintense adenoma suspicious lesion on the left wing of the pituitary gland on MRI, and DOTATOC uptake was shown in the left side of the pituitary gland. BIPSS revealed a central tumor, lateralized to the right side of the pituitary. The surgeon identified a solid tumor on the right side of the pituitary gland and successfully removed it. Results of pathology and ACTH immunohistochemistry identified an ACTH-secreting pituitary tumor.
The second case (case 28) was diagnosed with ACTH-dependent CD. The basal ACTH level was 37.76 pg/mL and cortisol secretion was suppressed on the HD DST; however, sellar MRI did not reveal any suspicious lesions. DOTATOC uptake was identified on the left side of the pituitary gland. BIPSS identified a central tumor but failed to lateralize the tumor. Surgery revealed an ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma in the middle of the pituitary gland.
Comparison of imaging and clinical characteristics depending on successful localization of corticotroph adenomas on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT
Twenty-three adenomas were successfully localized using 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, while seven were not. We compared several parameters between the successful and failed tumor localization groups using 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT (Table 4).
Between the two groups, there was no difference in median age at diagnosis (34 years vs. 42 years), female proportion (74% vs. 86%), 24-hour UFC level (712.50 µg/day vs. 456.20 µg/day), and pre-operative cortisol level (20.60 µg/dL vs. 18.80 µg/dL) (all P>0.05). The only difference between the two groups was the pre-operative ACTH level. The pre-operative ACTH level in the group with successful localization (84.41 pg/mL [range, 39.24 to 286.40]) was significantly higher than that in the group without localization (37.26 pg/mL [range, 19.99 to 77.58], P=0.001). Further, the success rate for localization was not affected by the tumor size when using 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT (8.50 mm [range, 3.00 to 29.00] vs. 6.0 mm [range, 4.00 to 72.00], P=1.000).
Prediction for successful localization of ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas using 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT
A binary logistic regression model predicting the successful localization using 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT with pre-operative ACTH levels was found to be statistically significant (chi-square value 1=16.24, P=0.001), with a Nagelkerke R-squared value of 0.631. The pre-operative ACTH level was statistically significant in predicting the odds of successful localization using 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT (odds ratio, 1.096; 95% CI, 1.020 to 1.178; P=0.013). For every 10 pg/mL increase in ACTH levels, the localizing success rate using 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT increased by 96%, according to this model.
The ROC curve for the pre-operative ACTH level to predict the localization of corticotroph tumors is shown in Fig. 2. The area under the curve was 0.932, with a cutoff value of 53.86 pg/mL (Youden index: 0.770). ACTH levels higher than 53.86 pg/mL showed the best diagnostic accuracy for the successful localization of primary lesions in CD, with a sensitivity and specificity of 91.3% and 85.7%, respectively.
68Ga-DOTATOC uptake in the patients with Cushing’s disease
We included 23 pituitary adenomas which were successfully localized in 68Ga-DOTATOC PET scan, and evaluated SUVmean and SUVmax. All ICCs for SUV measurements were above 0.75, and the results were reliable. The results are presented in Fig. 3. The SUVmean of adenoma was lower than that of the surrounding normal tissue, but this difference was not statistically significant (4.86 [range, 1.84 to 11.25] vs. 6.26 [range, 1.69 to 25.56], Z=–0.824, P=0.410). There was no significant difference in SUVmax either (6.39 [range, 2.57 to 12.52] vs. 7.50 [range, 2.98 to 27.90], Z=–1.048, P=0.295). Additionally, we found that both SUV of adenoma correlated to pre-operative ACTH level (SUVmean Spearman rho=–0.415, P=0.049; SUVmax Spearman rho=–0.415, P=0.049).
In this study, 83.33% of the patients with surgically proven ACTH-producing pituitary tumors showed focal DOTATOC uptake at their pituitary glands on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. There were no differences in the imaging or clinical characteristics between patients with and without DOTATOC uptake. Of the 25 patients, 23 showed DOTATOC uptake at a location consistent with that identified during surgery. Patients with successful localization had higher pre-operative ACTH levels than those with failed localization. The success rate of localization was not statistically different among 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, MRI, and BIPSS. Tumor size did not influence the success of tumor localization by 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. We identified that pre-operative ACTH level was a predictive factor for successful localization of the primary lesion, with a threshold of 53.86 pg/mL. Moreover, patients with higher plasma ACTH levels were more likely to have the primary lesion successfully located on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT than those with lower plasma ACTH levels.
MRI is the imaging modality of choice for the detection of ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas [4]. Prior studies have shown that ACTH-producing pituitary microadenomas are undetectable on 1.5T MRI in 36%–64% of cases [15-17]. In our study, three out of 18 adenomas (20%) confirmed by surgery failed to localize on MRI.
We found that the diagnostic success of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT was determined by the hormonal activity of the corticotroph adenomas, but not by size. However, previous studies have reported that the localization of corticotroph adenomas using MRI is affected by the size of the adenomas rather than by hormonal activity [16,18]. Adenoma size does not necessarily correlate with the degree of hypercortisolism in CD [19]. Patients with smaller adenomas may present with higher hypercortisolism. Thus, 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT could be a promising approach to improving diagnostic success compared to MRI alone for certain patients with smaller adenomas but higher ACTH secretion.
We believe that in such instances, 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT may help clinicians localize corticotroph adenomas before surgical removal, especially in patients with high ACTH secretions. However, in our study, there were no cases with negative MRI findings identified on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET imaging. In our research, the focus was on a small group, and there were only a few instances of negative MRI cases. The initial factor behind this is the enhanced MRI detection rate attributed to the advanced scanning technology used at our institution. We performed 3.0T MRI with dynamic contrast-enhanced, half-dose contrast, and spoiled gradient recalled acquisition; these sequences were reported to enhance the MRI detection rate for CD [20-23]. Moreover, we included the subjects who underwent TSA and had confirmed pathologically-positive ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas. This meant that cases without surgery were excluded because the ACTH source was not clearly identified. We expect further studies on the role of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in CD to confirm the possibilities we have suggested.
Corticotropic pituitary tumors have been reported to exhibit lower DOTATOC uptake compared to normal pituitary tissue in healthy subjects [24]. Similarly, another study found that functioning pituitary microadenomas, including 89.1% of adrenocorticotropic adenomas, demonstrated decreased DOTA-octreotate (DOTATATE) uptake relative to surrounding normal tissue [25]. These findings suggest that hypercortisolism may downregulate SSTR2 expression, reducing DOTATOC uptake [24,26].
Our data showed that ACTH hypersecretion was associated with lower DOTATOC uptake and served as a favorable predictor for successful tumor localization. This may be explained by the reduced SSTR2 expression in both adenomas and surrounding normal tissue due to hypercortisolism, improving visual discrimination. Plasma ACTH levels, as a direct indicator of tumor activity, may better reflect receptor expression compared to systemic cortisol levels, which are influenced by metabolic and circadian factors. Although SSTR5 expression in corticotropic adenomas can theoretically bind 68Ga-DOTATOC, tumor size or tracer kinetics may also contribute to localization success. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to clarify the mechanisms linking ACTH secretion, SSTR expression, and 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake in CD.
Radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, such as 68Ga-DOTATATE and 68Ga-DOTATOC, are valuable tools for diagnosing and treating NETs by targeting overexpressed SSTR. While both compounds exhibit similar binding profiles, 68Ga-DOTATATE has approximately 10-fold higher in vitro affinity for SSTR2 compared to 68Ga-DOTATOC [27]. This difference may influence their effectiveness in detecting NETs, which frequently overexpress SSTR2. However, clinical data comparing their uptake in NETs remain inconsistent, with some studies favoring 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and others suggesting better diagnostic outcomes with 68Ga-DOTATOC PET [28-30]. Currently, no direct comparisons exist for these two compounds regarding the localization of ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Future research should directly compare the diagnostic utility of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in patients with CD.
In this study, we evaluated the successful localization of corticotroph adenomas, but not their detection, using diagnostic modalities. This meant that we defined failed localization as adenomas that were identified on the left side of the pituitary gland on imaging but that were confirmed to be located on the right side upon surgery. In these cases, there may be opinions claiming that tumor detection was successful because imaging predicted the presence of tumors in the pituitary gland, especially considering the low resolution of PET/CT. However, we determined that these cases failed to localize the adenomas to avoid potential false positives. In addition, it is important to evaluate the ability of imaging to determine the location within the pituitary gland rather than the presence of the tumor alone. Evidence of localization before surgery can convince surgeons to perform guided hemi-hypophysectomies.
Our study has several limitations. This study has the inherent limitations of a retrospective study design. Because the primary aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the localization of pituitary tumors, we recruited only pathologically positive samples. However, future studies might investigate the possible role of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the detection of pituitary tumors by including both pathologically negative and positive samples. Furthermore, even if the tumors identified via the imaging modalities were real corticotroph adenomas, we may have missed subjects with negative immunohistochemistry results. This study did not use a quantitative definition of pituitary adenoma on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, though SUV values were used to describe DOTATOC uptake in corticotropic pituitary adenomas. While some studies defined adenomas quantitatively using SUVs, these definitions vary due to differing reference regions and cutoff values, resulting in no consensus [31-33]. In this study, adenomas were identified based on a visual assessment of increased or decreased uptake relative to background tissue, considering clinical context and prior imaging. This method aligns with previous studies where experienced specialists visually identified tumor characteristics [24,34,35]. We also know that the definition by experienced specialists shows a high degree of concordance and that statistics are available to evaluate its reliability, variability may still occur. This limitation is acknowledged, and future studies should aim to establish standardized criteria, including potential SUV-based thresholds, to improve reproducibility [14].
Timely and accurate localization of ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas is associated with prognosis and quality of life; however, this is clinically challenging. This study showed that the plasma ACTH level before surgery was a favorable predictor for the successful localization of primary lesions by 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, with a 53.86 pg/mL threshold. However, the use of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT as adjuvant imaging did not improve localization success compared to using MRI alone.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The study was supported by the “Team Science Award” of Yonsei University College of Medicine (6-2022-0150).

We would like to thank Professor Eung-Hyuck Cho for his invaluable help with the nuclear medicine analysis.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception or design: K.K., C.R.K., E.J.L. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: K.K., D.K., M.H.L., Y.W.P., S. S.A., J.H.M., E.H.K., S.H.K. Drafting the work or revising: K.K., D.K., C.R.K. Final approval of the manuscript: C.R.K., E.J.L.

Fig. 1.
Images of 68gallium-DOTATOC (68Ga-DOTATOC) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (A) 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT image. It showed increased 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake in the left sellar region. (B) MRI. A 2.9 cm-sized solid cystic lesion with left cavernous sinus invasion. (C) 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT image. Focal 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake was observed in left lateral wing of sellar area on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. (D) MRI. A 1.4 cm enhancing lesion with hemorrhage was located in the right lateral wing on MRI.
enm-2024-2249f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the accuracy of plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) as a tool to determine the successful localization of ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas using 68gallium-DOTATOC positron emission tomography/computed tomography. The area under the curve was 0.932, with a cutoff of 53.86 pg/mL. An 8:00 AM plasma ACTH level higher than 53.86 pg/mL showed the best diagnostic accuracy for the successful localization of the primary lesions (sensitivity, 91.3%; specificity, 85.7%).
enm-2024-2249f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Standardized uptake values (SUVs) of the patients with Cushing’s disease. The mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) (A) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (B) of corticotroph adenomas and normal pituitaries are shown. The SUVs between corticotroph adenoma and the surrounding normal tissue was not significantly different. Bars presented median and interquartile range of this figure.
enm-2024-2249f3.jpg
Table 1.
Imaging and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Cushing’s Disease
Characteristic Total DOTATOC uptake No-uptake P value
Number 30 25 5
Age at diagnosis, yr 34.00 (15.00–68.00) 30.00 (15.00–68.00) 51.00 (19.00–63.00) 0.090
Sex 0.304
 Male 7 (23.33) 7 (28.00) 0
 Female 23 (76.67) 18 (72.00) 5 (100.00)
24-hr UFC, µg/day 683.00 (184.70–2,661.80) 694.60 (233.80–2,661.80) 456.20 (184.70–1,983.40) 0.597
Pre-op ACTH, pg/mL 78.89 (19.90–286.40) 84.30 (19.90–286.40) 50.87 (34.30–77.58) 0.080
Pre-op cortisol, µg/dL 20.55 (5.20–112.70) 20.60 (8.10–112.70) 17.90 (5.20–24.30) 0.522
Size on MRI, mm 8.50 (3.00–72.00) 8.75 (3.00–72.00) 5.00 (4.00–10.00) 0.977
Suppression on ON DST 0 0 0 1.000
Suppression on HD DST 14/21 (66.67) 11/17 (64.71) 3/4 (75.00) 1.000
Knosp classification 0.891
 0 20 (66.67) 16 (64.00) 4 (80.00)
 1 3 (10.00) 2 (8.00) 1 (20.00)
 2 2 (6.67) 2 (8.00) 0
 3a 1 (3.33) 1 (4.00) 0
 3b 1 (3.33) 1 (4.00) 0
 4 3 (10.00) 3 (12.00) 0

Values are expressed as median (range) or number (%).

UFC, urine free cortisol; op, operative; ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ON DST, overnight dexamethasone suppression test; HD DST, high-dose dexamethasone suppression test.

Table 2.
Comparisons Regarding Localizing Adrenocorticotropic Hormone-Secreting Adenomas on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, MRI, and BIPSS in Cushing’s Disease
Variable Total Successful localization
P value
Macroadenoma Microadenoma
68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT 23/30 (76.67) 9/11 (81.81) 14/19 (73.68) 0.485
MRI 27/30 (90.00) 11/11 (100.00) 16/19 (84.21) 0.239
BIPSS 17/25 (68.00) 7/9 (77.78) 10/16 (62.50) 0.374

Values are expressed as number/total number (%).

68Ga-DOTATOC, 68gallium-DOTATOC; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; BIPSS, bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling.

Table 3.
Qualitative Analysis for Localizing Pituitary Adenomas by Diagnostic Modalities for Cushing’s Disease
Subject number Sex, age, yr 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT MRI Size, mm BIPSS
1 F, 64 + + 3.0
2 F, 24 + + 3.5 +
3 F, 44 + + 4.0 +
4 F, 19 + 4.0 +
5 M, 25 + + 5.0
6 F, 63 + 5.0
7 F, 15 + + 5.5 +
8 F, 58 + + 6.0 +
9 F, 28 + + 6.0
10 M, 25 + + 6.0 +
11 F, 39 + + 6.0
12 F, 18 + + 6.0 +
13 F, 68 + + 8.0
14 F, 17 + + 8.5 +
15 F, 30 + + 9.0 +
16 M, 23 + + 9.0
17 F, 51 + 10.0 +
18 F, 46 + + 10.0
19 F, 34 + + 10.0
20 F, 20 + + 10.0
21 M, 20 + + 13.0 +
22 F, 40 + + 14.0 +
23 F, 38 + + 14.0
24 F, 34 + + 16.0 +
25 M, 65 + + 17.0 +
26 M, 49 + + 29.0 +
27 M, 42 + 72.0 +
28 F, 24
29 F, 28 +
30 F, 50

Subjects are numbered according to the study convention. Successful or failed localization was denoted by ‘+’ and ‘–’ compared to the final location of the ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma. Subjects 28 and 29 were false-positive cases for 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, as they showed suspicious 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake, but the uptake location ultimately differed from the final location identified via surgery.

68Ga-DOTATOC, 68gallium-DOTATOC; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; BIPSS, bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling.

Table 4.
Comparison of the Characteristics Depending on the Successful Localization of ACTH-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT
Characteristic Localization
P value
Success (n=23) Fail (n=7)
Age at diagnosis, yr 34.00 (15.00–68.00) 42.00 (19.00–63.00) 0.462
Female sex 17 (73.91) 6 (85.71) 0.468
24-hr UFC, µg/day 712.50 (184.70–2,661.80) 456.20 (233.80–1,983.40) 0.292
Plasma ACTH, pg/mL 84.41 (39.24–286.40) 37.26 (19.99–77.58) 0.001
Plasma cortisol, µg/dL 20.60 (5.20–112.70) 18.80 (15.60–27.90) 0.848
Adenoma size, mm 8.50 (3.00–29.00) 6.00 (4.00–72.00) 1.000

Values are expressed as median (range) or number (%).

ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; 68Ga-DOTATOC, 68gallium-DOTATOC; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; UFC, urine free cortisol.

  • 1. Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet 2006;367:1605–17.ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Park JS, Yun SJ, Lee JK, Park SY, Chin SO. Descriptive epidemiology and survival analysis of prolactinomas and Cushing’s disease in Korea. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2021;36:688–96.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 3. Valassi E, Feelders R, Maiter D, Chanson P, Yaneva M, Reincke M, et al. Worse health-related quality of life at long-term follow-up in patients with Cushing’s disease than patients with cortisol producing adenoma: data from the ERCUSYN. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2018;88:787–98.PubMed
  • 4. Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, Ben-Shlomo A, Bertherat J, Biermasz NR, et al. Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021;9:847–75.PubMedPMC
  • 5. Boyle J, Patronas NJ, Smirniotopoulos J, Herscovitch P, Dieckman W, Millo C, et al. CRH stimulation improves 18F-FDG-PET detection of pituitary adenomas in Cushing’s disease. Endocrine 2019;65:155–65.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 6. Koulouri O, Steuwe A, Gillett D, Hoole AC, Powlson AS, Donnelly NA, et al. A role for 11C-methionine PET imaging in ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol 2015;173:M107–20.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Bauman MM, Graves JP, Harrison DJ, Hassett LC, Bancos I, Johnson DR, et al. The utility of PET for detecting corticotropinomas in Cushing disease: a scoping review. Neurosurg Rev 2023;46:160.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 8. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Stewart PM, et al. The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:1526–40.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 9. Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C. Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 1993;33:610–8.ArticlePubMed
  • 10. Micko AS, Wohrer A, Wolfsberger S, Knosp E. Invasion of the cavernous sinus space in pituitary adenomas: endoscopic verification and its correlation with an MRI-based classification. J Neurosurg 2015;122:803–11.ArticlePubMed
  • 11. Park JW, Park S, Kim JL, Lee HY, Shin JE, Hyun DH, et al. Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling by unilateral femoral venous approach. Neurointervention 2011;6:23–6.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 12. Perlman JE, Johnston PC, Hui F, Mulligan G, Weil RJ, Recinos PF, et al. Pitfalls in performing and interpreting inferior petrosal sinus sampling: personal experience and literature review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021;106:e1953–67.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 13. Sharma ST, Raff H, Nieman LK. Prolactin as a marker of successful catheterization during IPSS in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:3687–94.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 14. Jakobsson U, Westergren A. Statistical methods for assessing agreement for ordinal data. Scand J Caring Sci 2005;19:427–31.ArticlePubMed
  • 15. Ludecke DK, Flitsch J, Knappe UJ, Saeger W. Cushing’s disease: a surgical view; this publication is dedicated to our professor emeritus Dr. med. Rudolf Kautzky. J Neurooncol 2001;54:151–66.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 16. Buchfelder M, Nistor R, Fahlbusch R, Huk WJ. The accuracy of CT and MR evaluation of the sella turcica for detection of adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting adenomas in Cushing disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:1183–90.PubMedPMC
  • 17. Jeon JS, Choi SJ, Shin CS, Park KS, Kim SY, Cho BY, et al. The localization of microadenoma with sella imaging study and inferior petrosal sinus sampling in Cushing’s disease. J Korean Soc Endocrinol 1996;11:492–9.
  • 18. Sharifi G, Amin AA, Sabahi M, Echeverry NB, Dilmaghani NA, Mousavinejad SA, et al. MRI-negative Cushing’s disease: management strategy and outcomes in 15 cases utilizing a pure endoscopic endonasal approach. BMC Endocr Disord 2022;22:154.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 19. Mathioudakis N, Pendleton C, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Wand GS, Salvatori R. ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas: size does not correlate with hormonal activity. Pituitary 2012;15:526–32.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 20. Lee HB, Kim ST, Kim HJ, Kim KH, Jeon P, Byun HS, et al. Usefulness of the dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with simultaneous acquisition of coronal and sagittal planes for detection of pituitary microadenomas. Eur Radiol 2012;22:514–8.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 21. Portocarrero-Ortiz L, Bonifacio-Delgadillo D, Sotomayor-Gonzalez A, Garcia-Marquez A, Lopez-Serna R. A modified protocol using half-dose gadolinium in dynamic 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for detection of ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors. Pituitary 2010;13:230–5.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 22. Batista D, Courkoutsakis NA, Oldfield EH, Griffin KJ, Keil M, Patronas NJ, et al. Detection of adrenocorticotropin-secreting pituitary adenomas by magnetic resonance imaging in children and adolescents with Cushing disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:5134–40.ArticlePubMed
  • 23. Patronas N, Bulakbasi N, Stratakis CA, Lafferty A, Oldfield EH, Doppman J, et al. Spoiled gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state technique is superior to conventional postcontrast spin echo technique for magnetic resonance imaging detection of adrenocorticotropin-secreting pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:1565–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 24. Tjornstrand A, Casar-Borota O, Heurling K, Scholl M, Gjertsson P, Ragnarsson O, et al. Pre- and postoperative 68Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography for hormone-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2021;94:956–67.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 25. Wang H, Hou B, Lu L, Feng M, Zang J, Yao S, et al. PET/MRI in the diagnosis of hormone-producing pituitary microadenoma: a prospective pilot study. J Nucl Med 2018;59:523–8.ArticlePubMed
  • 26. Pivonello R, Munster PN, Terzolo M, Ferrigno R, Simeoli C, Puglisi S, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor antagonism upregulates somatostatin receptor subtype 2 expression in ACTH-producing neuroendocrine tumors: new insight based on the selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator relacorilant. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022;12:793262.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 27. Reubi JC, Schar JC, Waser B, Wenger S, Heppeler A, Schmitt JS, et al. Affinity profiles for human somatostatin receptor subtypes SST1-SST5 of somatostatin radiotracers selected for scintigraphic and radiotherapeutic use. Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27:273–82.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 28. Forrer F, Uusijarvi H, Waldherr C, Cremonesi M, Bernhardt P, Mueller-Brand J, et al. A comparison of (111)In-DOTATOC and (111)In-DOTATATE: biodistribution and dosimetry in the same patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:1257–62.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 29. Esser JP, Krenning EP, Teunissen JJ, Kooij PP, van Gameren AL, Bakker WH, et al. Comparison of [(177)Lu-DOTA(0), Tyr(3)]octreotate and [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotide: which peptide is preferable for PRRT? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:1346–51.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 30. Poeppel TD, Binse I, Petersenn S, Lahner H, Schott M, Antoch G, et al. 68Ga-DOTATOC versus 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in functional imaging of neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med 2011;52:1864–70.ArticlePubMed
  • 31. Meric K, Killeen RP, Abi-Ghanem AS, Soliman F, Novruzov F, Cakan E, et al. The use of 18F-FDG PET ratios in the differential diagnosis of common malignant brain tumors. Clin Imaging 2015;39:970–4.ArticlePubMed
  • 32. Delbeke D, Meyerowitz C, Lapidus RL, Maciunas RJ, Jennings MT, Moots PL, et al. Optimal cutoff levels of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the differentiation of low-grade from high-grade brain tumors with PET. Radiology 1995;195:47–52.ArticlePubMed
  • 33. Chen W, Silverman DH. Advances in evaluation of primary brain tumors. Semin Nucl Med 2008;38:240–50.ArticlePubMed
  • 34. Novruzov F, Aliyev A, Wan MY, Syed R, Mehdi E, Aliyeva I, et al. The value of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT in diagnosis and management of suspected pituitary tumors. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 2021;5:10.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 35. Putzer D, Gabriel M, Henninger B, Kendler D, Uprimny C, Dobrozemsky G, et al. Bone metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumor: 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in comparison to CT and bone scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1214–21.ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • PubReader PubReader
      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        Cite
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the Localization of Pituitary Tumors in Cushing’s Disease
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      • 1
      • 2
      68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the Localization of Pituitary Tumors in Cushing’s Disease
      Image Image Image
      Fig. 1. Images of 68gallium-DOTATOC (68Ga-DOTATOC) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (A) 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT image. It showed increased 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake in the left sellar region. (B) MRI. A 2.9 cm-sized solid cystic lesion with left cavernous sinus invasion. (C) 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT image. Focal 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake was observed in left lateral wing of sellar area on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. (D) MRI. A 1.4 cm enhancing lesion with hemorrhage was located in the right lateral wing on MRI.
      Fig. 2. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the accuracy of plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) as a tool to determine the successful localization of ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas using 68gallium-DOTATOC positron emission tomography/computed tomography. The area under the curve was 0.932, with a cutoff of 53.86 pg/mL. An 8:00 AM plasma ACTH level higher than 53.86 pg/mL showed the best diagnostic accuracy for the successful localization of the primary lesions (sensitivity, 91.3%; specificity, 85.7%).
      Fig. 3. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) of the patients with Cushing’s disease. The mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) (A) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (B) of corticotroph adenomas and normal pituitaries are shown. The SUVs between corticotroph adenoma and the surrounding normal tissue was not significantly different. Bars presented median and interquartile range of this figure.
      68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the Localization of Pituitary Tumors in Cushing’s Disease
      Characteristic Total DOTATOC uptake No-uptake P value
      Number 30 25 5
      Age at diagnosis, yr 34.00 (15.00–68.00) 30.00 (15.00–68.00) 51.00 (19.00–63.00) 0.090
      Sex 0.304
       Male 7 (23.33) 7 (28.00) 0
       Female 23 (76.67) 18 (72.00) 5 (100.00)
      24-hr UFC, µg/day 683.00 (184.70–2,661.80) 694.60 (233.80–2,661.80) 456.20 (184.70–1,983.40) 0.597
      Pre-op ACTH, pg/mL 78.89 (19.90–286.40) 84.30 (19.90–286.40) 50.87 (34.30–77.58) 0.080
      Pre-op cortisol, µg/dL 20.55 (5.20–112.70) 20.60 (8.10–112.70) 17.90 (5.20–24.30) 0.522
      Size on MRI, mm 8.50 (3.00–72.00) 8.75 (3.00–72.00) 5.00 (4.00–10.00) 0.977
      Suppression on ON DST 0 0 0 1.000
      Suppression on HD DST 14/21 (66.67) 11/17 (64.71) 3/4 (75.00) 1.000
      Knosp classification 0.891
       0 20 (66.67) 16 (64.00) 4 (80.00)
       1 3 (10.00) 2 (8.00) 1 (20.00)
       2 2 (6.67) 2 (8.00) 0
       3a 1 (3.33) 1 (4.00) 0
       3b 1 (3.33) 1 (4.00) 0
       4 3 (10.00) 3 (12.00) 0
      Variable Total Successful localization
      P value
      Macroadenoma Microadenoma
      68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT 23/30 (76.67) 9/11 (81.81) 14/19 (73.68) 0.485
      MRI 27/30 (90.00) 11/11 (100.00) 16/19 (84.21) 0.239
      BIPSS 17/25 (68.00) 7/9 (77.78) 10/16 (62.50) 0.374
      Subject number Sex, age, yr 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT MRI Size, mm BIPSS
      1 F, 64 + + 3.0
      2 F, 24 + + 3.5 +
      3 F, 44 + + 4.0 +
      4 F, 19 + 4.0 +
      5 M, 25 + + 5.0
      6 F, 63 + 5.0
      7 F, 15 + + 5.5 +
      8 F, 58 + + 6.0 +
      9 F, 28 + + 6.0
      10 M, 25 + + 6.0 +
      11 F, 39 + + 6.0
      12 F, 18 + + 6.0 +
      13 F, 68 + + 8.0
      14 F, 17 + + 8.5 +
      15 F, 30 + + 9.0 +
      16 M, 23 + + 9.0
      17 F, 51 + 10.0 +
      18 F, 46 + + 10.0
      19 F, 34 + + 10.0
      20 F, 20 + + 10.0
      21 M, 20 + + 13.0 +
      22 F, 40 + + 14.0 +
      23 F, 38 + + 14.0
      24 F, 34 + + 16.0 +
      25 M, 65 + + 17.0 +
      26 M, 49 + + 29.0 +
      27 M, 42 + 72.0 +
      28 F, 24
      29 F, 28 +
      30 F, 50
      Characteristic Localization
      P value
      Success (n=23) Fail (n=7)
      Age at diagnosis, yr 34.00 (15.00–68.00) 42.00 (19.00–63.00) 0.462
      Female sex 17 (73.91) 6 (85.71) 0.468
      24-hr UFC, µg/day 712.50 (184.70–2,661.80) 456.20 (233.80–1,983.40) 0.292
      Plasma ACTH, pg/mL 84.41 (39.24–286.40) 37.26 (19.99–77.58) 0.001
      Plasma cortisol, µg/dL 20.60 (5.20–112.70) 18.80 (15.60–27.90) 0.848
      Adenoma size, mm 8.50 (3.00–29.00) 6.00 (4.00–72.00) 1.000
      Table 1. Imaging and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Cushing’s Disease

      Values are expressed as median (range) or number (%).

      UFC, urine free cortisol; op, operative; ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ON DST, overnight dexamethasone suppression test; HD DST, high-dose dexamethasone suppression test.

      Table 2. Comparisons Regarding Localizing Adrenocorticotropic Hormone-Secreting Adenomas on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, MRI, and BIPSS in Cushing’s Disease

      Values are expressed as number/total number (%).

      68Ga-DOTATOC, 68gallium-DOTATOC; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; BIPSS, bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling.

      Table 3. Qualitative Analysis for Localizing Pituitary Adenomas by Diagnostic Modalities for Cushing’s Disease

      Subjects are numbered according to the study convention. Successful or failed localization was denoted by ‘+’ and ‘–’ compared to the final location of the ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma. Subjects 28 and 29 were false-positive cases for 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, as they showed suspicious 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake, but the uptake location ultimately differed from the final location identified via surgery.

      68Ga-DOTATOC, 68gallium-DOTATOC; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; BIPSS, bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling.

      Table 4. Comparison of the Characteristics Depending on the Successful Localization of ACTH-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT

      Values are expressed as median (range) or number (%).

      ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; 68Ga-DOTATOC, 68gallium-DOTATOC; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; UFC, urine free cortisol.


      Endocrinol Metab : Endocrinology and Metabolism
      TOP