Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/enm-kes/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-10.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 100 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 101 Amelioration of Insulin Resistance after Delivery Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Postpartum Diabetes in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Endocrinol Metab : Endocrinology and Metabolism

clarivate
OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Endocrinol Metab > Ahead-of print > Article
Original Article
Amelioration of Insulin Resistance after Delivery Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Postpartum Diabetes in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Heejun Son1*orcid, Joon Ho Moon2*orcid, Sung Hee Choi2, Nam H. Cho3, Soo Heon Kwak4orcid, Hak Chul Jang2orcid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2024.1974
Published online: August 21, 2024

1Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

2Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea

3Department of Preventive Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea

4Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Corresponding authors: Soo Heon Kwak Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea Tel: +82-2-2072-4749, Fax: +82-2-764-2199, E-mail: shkwak@snu.ac.kr
Hak Chul Jang Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82 Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13620, Korea Tel: +82-31-787-7005, Fax: +82-31-787-4051, E-mail: janghak@snu.ac.kr
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
• Received: March 4, 2024   • Revised: April 21, 2024   • Accepted: May 7, 2024

Copyright © 2024 Korean Endocrine Society

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 373 Views
  • 20 Download
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • Background
    Identifying risk factors for postpartum type 2 diabetes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is crucial for effective interventions. We examined whether changes in insulin sensitivity after delivery affects the risk of type 2 diabetes in women with GDM.
  • Methods
    This prospective cohort study included 347 women with GDM or gestational impaired glucose tolerance, who attended the follow-up visits at 2 months postpartum and annually thereafter. Changes in insulin sensitivity were calculated using the Matsuda index at GDM diagnosis and at 2 months postpartum (ΔMatsuda index). After excluding women with pregestational diabetes or those followed up only once, we analyzed the risk of postpartum type 2 diabetes based on the ΔMatsuda index tertiles.
  • Results
    The incidence of type 2 diabetes at the two-month postpartum visit decreased with increasing ΔMatsuda index tertiles (16.4%, 9.5%, and 1.8%, P=0.001). During a 4.1-year follow-up, 26 out of 230 women who attended more than two follow-up visits (11.3%) developed type 2 diabetes. Compared to the lowest tertile, subjects in the highest ΔMatsuda index tertile showed a significantly reduced risk of type 2 diabetes (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.93; P=0.036) after adjusting for confounders.
  • Conclusion
    Improvement in insulin sensitivity after delivery is associated with a reduced risk of postpartum type 2 diabetes in women with GDM. Postpartum changes in insulin sensitivity could be a useful prediction for future type 2 diabetes development in women with GDM.
  • Keywords: Diabetes, gestational; Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Insulin resistance; Insulin sensitivity
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent pregnancy complication, affecting approximately one in six live births with hyperglycemia in pregnancy [1,2]. Its global prevalence is rising due to increasing maternal age and the escalating obesity epidemic among women of reproductive age [3,4]. GDM not only increases the risk of perinatal complications like macrosomia and cesarean section [5], but also raises significant concerns, as women with a history of GDM have a much higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes, with a reported lifetime risk of up to 10 times greater [6-8]. Furthermore, the metabolic disruptions experienced by women with GDM elevate their risk of cardiovascular disease by nearly three times compared to women without GDM [9-11]. This underscores the importance of implementing GDM management strategies that prioritize early detection and prevention of the subsequent type 2 diabetes. Identifying the risk factors associated with the development of postpartum type 2 diabetes in women with a history of GDM is therefore crucial for developing effective interventions to prevent this condition.
Previous studies have identified various risk factors associated with postpartum type 2 diabetes. Some, like maternal age, pre-pregnancy body weight, ethnicity, and genetic factors, are non-modifiable [7,8,12], while others, like postpartum body weight, lactation, physical activity, and diet, can be adjusted. Notably, most modifiable factors influence maternal insulin sensitivity [13,14]. Women with reduced insulin sensitivity during pregnancy or those requiring insulin are at increased risk for postpartum diabetes [15]. This suggests that insulin resistance plays a key role in progression to postpartum diabetes, especially for women with GDM who harbor impaired pancreatic β-cell function.
People who develop type 2 diabetes likely exhibit varying degrees of baseline insulin resistance and β-cell function [16]. As an illustration, despite Asians generally having leaner bodies and higher insulin sensitivity compare to Western populations, the incidence of GDM in Asians is comparable to that in Western populations [5,17,18]. Furthermore, pregnancy induces significant shifts in insulin sensitivity due to hormonal changes [19]. This has led to the hypothesis that postpartum changes in insulin sensitivity, rather than pre-pregnancy levels, may play a more significant role in determining postpartum diabetes risk in women with GDM.
In this multicenter prospective cohort study, we investigated whether alterations in insulin sensitivity before and after delivery affect the risk of type 2 diabetes in Korean women with a history of GDM.
Study design
This multicenter, prospective cohort study involved participants diagnosed with GDM or gestational impaired glucose intolerance (GIGT) at two tertiary hospitals in Korea (Ajou University Hospital and Cheil General Hospital) between August 1995 and May 1997. Follow-up visits occurred annually starting at 2 months postpartum.
Study participants
Screening for GDM began at 24 to 28 weeks of gestation with a 50-g oral glucose challenge. A 1-hour glucose value of 130 mg/dL or higher triggered a subsequent 3-hour, 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for confirmation. GDM diagnosis followed the Third International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus recommendations, adopted during the study’s enrollment phase [5]. Two or more of the following criteria defined GDM, while one criterion sufficed for GIGT: fasting plasma glucose ≥105 mg/dL or greater, 1-hour glucose ≥ 190 mg/dL, 2-hour glucose ≥165 mg/dL or greater, or 3-hour glucose ≥145 mg/dL.
A total of 475 women diagnosed with GDM or GIGT who attended at least one follow-up were enrolled (Supplemental Fig. S1). Women with pregestational diabetes (n=39), defined by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5% or fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL, were excluded [20]. After excluding subjects with missing data (n=89), 347 women remained eligible for analysis. Their insulin sensitivity was assessed using a standard 75-g OGTT, and postpartum type 2 diabetes was diagnosed if applicable. All participants volunteered and provided informed consent. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (B-1007-105-007) and was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Postpartum follow-up examination
Obstetric history, including pre-pregnancy weight, weight at GDM or GIGT diagnosis, gestational weight gain, and pregnancy outcome, was extracted from medical records. At the initial postpartum visit, a standardized questionnaire collected information about the individual’s past medical and reproductive history, as well as their family history of diabetes. Subsequent visits, starting at 2 months postpartum, included anthropometric measures (body weight, height, blood pressure, and body composition), a standard 75-g OGTT, and fasting glucose and lipid profile measurements.
Following an overnight fast of at least 8 hours, subjects underwent a 75-g OGTT. Plasma glucose levels were measured enzymatically using an automated analyzer (YSI 2300-STAT, Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Yellow Springs, OH, USA) via the glucose oxidase method. Plasma insulin levels were determined by radioimmunoassay (Linco Research Inc., St. Charles, MO, USA). Total cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were analyzed with an enzymatic assay using a Beckman analyzer from Beckman Instruments. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald equation.
Definitions and glycemic assessment
Insulin sensitivity and β-cell function were derived from plasma glucose and insulin concentrations measured during annual postpartum 75-g OGTT. Insulin sensitivity was estimated using the Matsuda index [21]: 10,000/(fasting glucose×fasting insulin×mean glucose×mean insulin). The insulinogenic index [22] was calculated as follows to assess insulin secretion: [insulin (30 min)–insulin (0 min)]/[glucose (30 min)–glucose (0 min)]. The disposition index [23] was used to evaluate the combined effect of insulin secretion and sensitivity on glucose metabolism: Matsuda index×insulinogenic index. During pregnancy, insulin sensitivity and β-cell function were derived from the 100-g OGTT, and glucose and insulin concentrations at 60 minutes were used instead of 30 minutes for the insulinogenic index calculation. The homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were further calculated from fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels [24].
Changes in insulin sensitivity including ∆Matsuda index, or β-cell function alterations were defined as the difference between the initial postpartum (2 months after delivery) value and the gestational value, determined using glucose and insulin values from two separate OGTTs. The diagnostic 100-g OGTT for GDM provided data from fasting, 1-, 2-, and 3-hour values of glucose and insulin, while the 75-g OGTT conducted at the initial postpartum visit yielded values from fasting, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. The ∆Matsuda index served as the primary variable for subsequent analysis.
Statistical analysis
Subjects were divided into tertiles based on their ∆Matsuda index for analysis. Differences between the groups were assessed using independent t-tests or analysis of variance for continuous variables, and chi-squared tests or linear-by-linear association for categorical variables. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association between the ∆Matsuda index and the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Adjustments were made for factors known to influence postpartum type 2 diabetes, including fasting blood glucose, postpartum body mass index (BMI), breastfeeding, age at birth, familial history of diabetes, and parity. Additional analyses adjusted for covariates were found significant in the multivariate analysis.
Data are presented as the mean±standard deviation or median (interquartile ranges) for continuous variables, and number (%) for categorical variables. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA).
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Clinical characteristics and metabolic phenotypes of subjects
Our analysis included 347 women, with a median follow-up of 2.9 examinations (interquartile range, 1.0 to 4.0). A total of 60 out of 347 subjects (17.3%) developed type 2 diabetes. Compared to those who remained diabetes-free, women who developed type 2 diabetes were more likely to be obese before pregnancy and lactated less (Table 1).
Subjects who developed postpartum type 2 diabetes also displayed higher glucose levels during and after pregnancy, as determined by their OGTT results. They exhibited elevated fasting insulin levels and blunted glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, indicating insulin resistance and impaired β-cell function. Consequently, their postpartum Matsuda index, insulinogenic index, and disposition index were consistently lower.
Interestingly, subsequent analysis revealed that changes in β-cell function (∆insulinogenic index and ∆HOMA-β) after delivery did not differ between women who did or did not develop type 2 diabetes. However, changes in insulin sensitivity (∆Matsuda index and ∆HOMA-IR) did show a difference. This finding prompted us to investigate further whether changes in insulin sensitivity after delivery could predict the future development of type 2 diabetes.
Postpartum changes in insulin sensitivity and development of type 2 diabetes
The subjects were categorized into tertiles based on their ∆Matsuda index. The numerical ranges for the lowest, middle, and highest tertiles of ∆Matsuda index were –10.9 to –1.1, –1.0 to 1.0, 1.0 to 8.5, respectively. Cross-sectional analysis showed a decreasing trend in type 2 diabetes at their 2-month postpartum visit as the tertile of ∆Matsuda index increased (Table 2). The incidence was 16.4%, 9.5%, and 1.8% in the lowest, middle, and highest tertiles, respectively (P=0.001), and the trend persisted for the combined incidence of postpartum prediabetes and type 2 diabetes, as detailed in Table 2.
Excluding women diagnosed with type 2 diabetes on their first postpartum visit and those who visited only once after childbirth, 230 subjects remained eligible for longitudinal analysis (Supplemental Fig. S1). At baseline, no significant differences were observed in age at delivery, pregestational BMI, postpartum BMI, or gestational weight gain between the ∆Matsuda index tertiles (Supplemental Table S1). Although HbA1c during pregnancy did not differ across tertiles, insulin levels were higher in the highest tertile. Blood pressure and lipid profiles were similar among the groups.
We further investigated the association between the ∆Matsuda index and the incidence of type 2 diabetes using a time-to-event analysis (Supplemental Table S2). During a median follow-up of 4.1 years (3.0 to 5.1) and 3.8 visits (2.0 to 5.0), 26 out of 230 women (11.3%) developed type 2 diabetes. The number of subjects who developed type 2 diabetes was 11 (14.5%), nine (11.7%), and six (7.8%) in the lowest, middle, and highest tertiles, respectively. Notably, the number of subjects who developed prediabetes or type 2 diabetes steadily decreased across the ∆Matsuda index tertiles, from 51.3% to 48.1% to 36.4%.
To assess whether the ∆Matsuda index was an independent predictor of incident type 2 diabetes, we adjusted for multiple clinical risk factors within a Cox proportional hazards model (Table 3). Higher gestational fasting plasma glucose and postpartum BMI were independently associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes (univariate model). After adjusting for known risk factors, participants in the highest tertile, demonstrating the greatest improvement in insulin sensitivity after delivery, had a significantly lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to the lowest tertile (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.93; P=0.036) (multivariate model in Table 3, Fig. 1).
The observed trend held true when the ∆Matsuda index was treated as a continuous variable (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.25; P=0.281), but statistical significance was not attained, possibly due to insufficient statistical power. We also investigated the association of gestational or postpartum Matsuda index alone with type 2 diabetes risk, but neither showed statistical significance.
Women with a history of GDM have a significantly higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes postpartum, with up to a 10-fold increase compared to those without GDM [6]. While the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the American Diabetes Association recommend postpartum glucose testing at 4 to 12 weeks postpartum, and subsequently every 1 to 3 years thereafter [25,26], less than half of women return for follow-up visits [27]. This highlights the importance of early identification of high-risk women, ensuring they receive accurate risk information, and establish a comprehensive follow-up plan. Our prospective cohort study demonstrates that postpartum changes in insulin sensitivity, measured by the ∆Matsuda index, are significantly associated with the risk of developing type 2 diabetes after pregnancy in women with a history of GDM. Therefore, this study provides evidence that monitoring insulin sensitivity changes from pregnancy to the early postpartum period can serve as an additional predictor of future type 2 diabetes risk in this specific population.
The risk of type 2 diabetes after GDM hinges on various factors, including non-modifiable ones like maternal age and genetic predisposition, potentially modifiable ones influenced by lifestyle modification [7,8,12,28]. Among modifiable factors, lactation and weight change are well-established contributors to improved insulin sensitivity after delivery.
Studies consistently show that longer lactation duration is associated with improved fasting glucose levels, lower insulin levels, and a sustained beneficial effect on glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity over time [14,29,30]. Postpartum weight change also impacts glucose metabolism and type 2 diabetes risk. A study by Peters et al. [25] found a two-fold increase in type 2 diabetes risk with a 4.5 kg postpartum weight gain. Similarly, our findings revealed that women who gained weight after postpartum had a roughly two-fold higher risk compared to those who lost weight [26]. Furthermore, post hoc analysis of the Diabetes Prevention Program [27] showed a 16% reduction in diabetes risk for every kilogram of weight loss.
Collectively, existing research supports promoting breastfeeding [29-31] and weight loss [25-27] among women with GDM as effective strategies for reducing their type 2 diabetes risk. This study’s Cox model identified postpartum BMI as a significant factor associated with postpartum diabetes, aligning with prior findings. This reinforces the importance of encouraging lifestyle modifications in women with GDM to mitigate their diabetes risk.
Regarding the link between postpartum weight change and insulin sensitivity, our previous work revealed a noteworthy finding: individuals with a greater postpartum BMI change experienced significant deterioration in insulin sensitivity [26]. Kew et al. [32] also reported that sustained weight loss at 3 and 12 months postpartum was associated with improved insulin sensitivity, as well as improved lipid profiles and higher adiponectin levels. Building on this research, our study provides clinical implications for lifestyle modifications, like weight loss, while also shedding light on predictive factors for postpartum type 2 diabetes risk.
Insulin resistance, alongside β-cell dysfunction, is recognized as key pathophysiological factors for type 2 diabetes [33-35]. In individuals who develop diabetes, the frequent co-occurrence of these factors has made it challenging and controversial to unravel their individual contributions to the disease’s development. Interestingly, our study showed no difference in β-cell function changes after delivery between those who progressed to type 2 diabetes and those who did not, while differences in insulin sensitivity changes were observed. However, when examining postpartum β-cell function in individuals who later developed diabetes, it was significantly lower compared to those who did not. This observation suggests a potential interplay, where weight gain and insulin resistance ultimately impact β-cells by increasing their secretory demands. While our findings offer a glimpse into this relationship, further studies are warranted to elucidate the relative contributions of insulin resistance and secretary insufficiency to type 2 diabetes risk in women with a history of GDM.
To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study to investigate postpartum changes in insulin sensitivity as a predictor of type 2 diabetes after GDM. In this study, the Matsuda index was employed as a measure of insulin sensitivity, validated in pregnancy and demonstrating stronger correlations with the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp measures compared to other insulin sensitivity models such as HOMA-IR [36]. However, this study has some limitations. Firstly, widespread access to fasting and postprandial insulin assays in primary care settings remains limited. Secondly, follow-up duration and intervals varied among participants. However, it is important to note that the mean follow-up duration within each ∆Matsuda index tertile was comparable, and we employed a Cox proportional hazards model to address this potential limitation. Additionally, Matsuda index calculation from the 100-g OGTT during mid-gestation utilized fasting, 1-, 2-, and 3-hour values of glucose and insulin, while the Matsuda index calculation from the initial postpartum 75-g OGTT utilized fasting, 30-, 60-, 90-, and 120-minute values of glucose and insulin. This difference in time points poses a challenge and may affect how we interpret insulin sensitivity and β-cell function throughout pregnancy and postpartum. Lastly, while the multivariate model showed a significant association, the univariate analysis did not reach statistical significance. This limitation highlights the necessity for larger sample sizes to validate the findings observed in this study.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that improvements in insulin sensitivity after delivery are associated with a reduced risk of postpartum type 2 diabetes in Korean women with GDM. While the assessment of insulin sensitivity lacks a standardized approach, the ∆Matsuda index can be a valuable tool for clinicians to predict postpartum type 2 diabetes risk in this population.

Supplemental Table S1.

Clinical Characteristics and Metabolic Phenotypes according to ∆Matsuda Index Tertiles
enm-2024-1974-Supplemental-Table-S1.pdf

Supplemental Table S2.

Cumulative Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes by ∆Matsuda Index
enm-2024-1974-Supplemental-Table-S2.pdf

Supplemental Fig. S1.

Flowchart for study participants. GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; GIGT, gestational impaired glucose intolerance.
enm-2024-1974-Supplemental-Fig-S1.pdf

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception or design: H.S., J.H.M., S.H.K., H.C.J. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: H.S., J.H.M., S.H.K., H.C.J. Drafting the work or revising: H.S., J.H.M., S.H.C., N.H.C., S.H.K., H.C.J. Final approval of the manuscript: H.S., J.H.M., S.H.C., N.H.C., S.H.K., H.C.J.

Acknowledgements
A part of this study was presented as an oral presentation at the 83rd Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, San Diego, June 23rd to June 26th, 2023.
This research was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea (grant numbers: 2021R1C1 C100987513 and RS-2023-00222910), Korea Health Industry Development Institute (HI22C0444), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (02-2021-0017).
Fig. 1.
Cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes according to ∆Matsuda index. ∆Matsuda index was defined as the difference between the initial postpartum Matsuda index and the gestational Matsuda index. Lowest tertiles ranged from –10.9 to –0.9, middle tertile from –0.8 to 1.2, highest tertile ranged from 1.2 to 8.8. Hazard ratio (HR) of postpartum type 2 diabetes are calculated using Cox proportional model including ∆Matsuda index and variables associated with postpartum type 2 diabetes (gestational fasting blood glucose, postpartum BMI, age at birth, familial history of diabetes, parity). CI, confidence interval.
enm-2024-1974f1.jpg
Table 1.
Clinical Characteristics and Metabolic Phenotypes according to Development of Postpartum Type 2 Diabetes
Characteristic Did not develop T2DM (n=288) Progression to T2DM (n=59) P value
Age at delivery, yr 31.6±4.1 32.1±4.4 0.396
Body mass index, pregestational, kg/m2 21.9±3.1 24.5±3.5 <0.001
BMI change, kg/m2 –0.1±1.3 0.0±1.2 0.978
Parity, n 2.1±1.6 1.9±1.7 0.369
Exercise 99 (34.4) 25 (41.7) 0.283
Breastfeeding 102 (35.4) 9 (15.0) 0.002
100-g OGTT at mid-gestation
 Glucose (fasting), mg/dL 87.9±11.2 100.5±14.1 <0.001
 Glucose (1-hour), mg/dL 185.9±28.4 203.7±36.6 <0.001
 Glucose (2-hour), mg/dL 172.7±27.1 195.8±33.9 <0.001
 Glucose (3-hour), mg/dL 145.6±25.8 165.3±31.8 <0.001
 Insulin (fasting), μIU/mL 8.7±6.8 9.3±3.8 0.023
 Insulin (1-hour), μIU/mL 65.2±49.0 45.9±37.8 0.004
 Insulin (2-hour), μIU/mL 88.1±61.7 64.3±50.8 0.005
 Insulin (3-hour), μIU/mL 75.7±52.2 60.9±38.6 0.033
75-g OGTT at initial postpartum visit (postpartum 2 months)
 Glucose (fasting), mg/dL 90.2±8.9 121.1±46.2 <0.001
 Glucose (30-minute), mg/dL 154.9±25.7 200.4±57.9 <0.001
 Glucose (60-minute), mg/dL 160.2±36.4 241.5±82.8 <0.001
 Glucose (90-minute), mg/dL 138.4±33.3 231.7±78.2 <0.001
 Glucose (120-minute), mg/dL 122.5±28.4 208.4±86.1 <0.001
 Insulin (fasting), μIU/mL 10.2±5.3 12.0±6.2 0.026
 Insulin (30-minute), μIU/mL 42.3±25.6 32.0±19.1 0.003
 Insulin (60-minute), μIU/mL 52.0±34.5 42.1±24.9 0.035
 Insulin (90-minute), μIU/mL 48.5±33.3 53.8±40.2 0.288
 Insulin (120-minute), μIU/mL 43.4±31.3 53.3±46.5 0.042
Longitudinal changes in glycemic measures
 Matsuda index
  Antepartum 5.2±2.7 5.0±2.8 0.524
  Postpartum 5.3±2.3 3.9±2.2 <0.001
  P valuea 0.717 0.010
  Mean difference 0.1±3.0 –1.0±3.3 0.011
 HOMA-IR
  Antepartum 1.9±1.1 2.3±1.0 0.002
  Postpartum 2.3±1.3 3.8±3.5 <0.001
  P valuea <0.001 0.003
  Mean difference 0.4±1.4 1.4±3.5 <0.001
 Insulinogenic index
  Antepartum 0.7±1.9 0.4±0.3 0.195
  Postpartum 0.6±0.4 0.3±0.2 <0.001
  P valuea 0.201 0.028
  Mean difference –0.1±1.8 –0.1±0.3 0.872
 HOMA-β
  Antepartum 141.7±98.3 109.6±98.4 0.023
  Postpartum 150.8±112.4 100.7±63.8 0.001
  P valuea 0.288 0.531
  Mean difference 9.1±145.4 –8.9±107.9 0.369
 Disposition index
  Antepartum 2.6±3.3 1.6±1.1 0.023
  Postpartum 2.7±2.3 1.0±1.0 <0.001
  P valuea 0.646 0.002
  Mean difference 0.1±3.9 –0.6±1.3 0.195

Values are expressed as mean±standard deviation or number (%). ΔMatsuda index was defined as the difference between the initial postpartum Matsuda index and the gestational Matsuda index. P values are for the t test or chi-square test to compare subjects with and without the occurrence of type 2 diabetes.

T2DM, type 2 diabetes; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-β, homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function.

a Paired t test from antepartum to postpartum values within each group.

Table 2.
Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes at 2 Months Postpartum Visit by ΔMatsuda Index
Variable ∆Matsuda index
 Total (n=347) P value
Lowest tertile (n=116) Middle tertile (n=116) Highest tertile (n=115)
Postpartum T2DM 19 (16.4) 11 (9.5) 2 (1.8) 32 (9.2) 0.001
Postpartum prediabetes and T2DM 67 (57.8) 52 (44.8) 32 (28.1) 151 (43.6) <0.001

Values are expressed as number (%). ΔMatsuda index was defined as the difference between the initial postpartum Matsuda index and the gestational Matsuda index. Lowest tertiles ranged from –10.9 to –1.1, middle tertile from –1.0 to 1.0, highest tertile ranged from 1.0 to 8.5. P values are for the chisquare test to compare the occurrence of postpartum T2DM and combined with postpartum prediabetes across the tertiles.

T2DM, type 2 diabetes.

Table 3.
Hazard Ratio of Postpartum Type 2 Diabetes by ΔMatsuda Index Tertile and Associated Variables by Cox Analysis
Variable Univariatea
 Multivariateb
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
∆Matsuda index tertile
 Lowest tertile 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 Middle tertile 0.72 (0.29–1.79) 0.484 0.52 (0.21–1.33) 0.175
 Highest tertile 0.59 (0.22–1.59) 0.293 0.33 (0.12–0.93) 0.036
Fasting plasma glucose 1.05 (1.03–1.08) <0.001 1.06 (1.03–1.09) <0.001
Postpartum body mass index 1.18 (1.06–1.32) <0.001 1.16 (1.03–1.30) 0.015
Age at birth 0.99 (0.90–1.09) 0.869 0.93 (0.84–1.04) 0.203
Family history of diabetes 1.00 (0.47–2.17) 0.992 0.98 (0.43–2.19) 0.950
Parity 0.90 (0.69–1.16) 0.414 0.87 (0.67–1.13) 0.305

HR of postpartum type 2 diabetes are calculated using Cox proportional model including ΔMatsuda index and variables associated with postpartum type 2 diabetes. ΔMatsuda index was defined as the difference between the initial postpartum Matsuda index and the gestational Matsuda index. Lowest tertiles ranged from –10.9 to –0.9, middle tertile from –0.8 to 1.2, highest tertile ranged from 1.2 to 8.8.

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a ΔMatsuda index and factors associated with postpartum type 2 diabetes (gestational fasting blood glucose, postpartum body mass index, age at birth, familial history of diabetes, parity) were included in the multivariate Cox model;

b ΔMatsuda index tertile was included as a covariate in addition to factors associated with postpartum type 2 diabetes in the multivariate Cox model.

  • 1. Guariguata L, Linnenkamp U, Beagley J, Whiting DR, Cho NH. Global estimates of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;103:176–85.ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022;183:109119.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2009;373:1773–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Kim KS, Hong S, Han K, Park CY. The clinical characteristics of gestational diabetes mellitus in Korea: a National Health Information Database Study. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2021;36:628–36.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 5. Metzger BE. Summary and recommendations of the Third International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes 1991;40 Suppl 2:197–201.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 6. Vounzoulaki E, Khunti K, Abner SC, Tan BK, Davies MJ, Gillies CL. Progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a known history of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2020;369:m1361.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 7. Moon JH, Kwak SH, Jang HC. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus. Korean J Intern Med 2017;32:26–41.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 8. Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH. Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1862–8.PubMed
  • 9. Kramer CK, Campbell S, Retnakaran R. Gestational diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular disease in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2019;62:905–14.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 10. Grandi SM, Filion KB, Yoon S, Ayele HT, Doyle CM, Hutcheon JA, et al. Cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality in women with a history of pregnancy complications. Circulation 2019;139:1069–79.PubMed
  • 11. Wicklow B, Retnakaran R. Gestational diabetes mellitus and its implications across the life span. Diabetes Metab J 2023;47:333–44.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 12. Moon JH, Jang HC. Gestational diabetes mellitus: diagnostic approaches and maternal-offspring complications. Diabetes Metab J 2022;46:3–14.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 13. Bengtson AM, Ramos SZ, Savitz DA, Werner EF. Risk factors for progression from gestational diabetes to postpartum type 2 diabetes: a review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2021;64:234–43.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 14. Moon JH, Kim H, Kim H, Park J, Choi W, Choi W, et al. Lactation improves pancreatic β cell mass and function through serotonin production. Sci Transl Med 2020;12:eaay0455.PubMedPMC
  • 15. Lobner K, Knopff A, Baumgarten A, Mollenhauer U, Marienfeld S, Garrido-Franco M, et al. Predictors of postpartum diabetes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 2006;55:792–7.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 16. Ahlqvist E, Storm P, Karajamaki A, Martinell M, Dorkhan M, Carlsson A, et al. Novel subgroups of adult-onset diabetes and their association with outcomes: a data-driven cluster analysis of six variables. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018;6:361–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Hedderson MM, Darbinian JA, Ferrara A. Disparities in the risk of gestational diabetes by race-ethnicity and country of birth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2010;24:441–8.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 18. Hedderson M, Ehrlich S, Sridhar S, Darbinian J, Moore S, Ferrara A. Racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus by BMI. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1492–8.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 19. Ryan EA. Hormones and insulin resistance during pregnancy. Lancet 2003;362:1777–8.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, Bannuru RR, Brown FM, Bruemmer D, et al. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care 2023;46(Suppl 1):S19–40.
  • 21. Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1462–70.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 22. Tura A, Kautzky-Willer A, Pacini G. Insulinogenic indices from insulin and C-peptide: comparison of beta-cell function from OGTT and IVGTT. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006;72:298–301.ArticlePubMed
  • 23. Retnakaran R, Qi Y, Goran MI, Hamilton JK. Evaluation of proposed oral disposition index measures in relation to the actual disposition index. Diabet Med 2009;26:1198–203.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 24. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985;28:412–9.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 25. Peters RK, Kjos SL, Xiang A, Buchanan TA. Long-term diabetogenic effect of single pregnancy in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1996;347:227–30.ArticlePubMed
  • 26. Moon JH, Kwak SH, Jung HS, Choi SH, Lim S, Cho YM, et al. Weight gain and progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:3548–55.Article
  • 27. Hamman RF, Wing RR, Edelstein SL, Lachin JM, Bray GA, Delahanty L, et al. Effect of weight loss with lifestyle intervention on risk of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:2102–7.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 28. Kwak SH, Choi SH, Jung HS, Cho YM, Lim S, Cho NH, et al. Clinical and genetic risk factors for type 2 diabetes at early or late post partum after gestational diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:E744–52.PubMed
  • 29. Gunderson EP, Hedderson MM, Chiang V, Crites Y, Walton D, Azevedo RA, et al. Lactation intensity and postpartum maternal glucose tolerance and insulin resistance in women with recent GDM: the SWIFT cohort. Diabetes Care 2012;35:50–6.PubMed
  • 30. Ziegler AG, Wallner M, Kaiser I, Rossbauer M, Harsunen MH, Lachmann L, et al. Long-term protective effect of lactation on the development of type 2 diabetes in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 2012;61:3167–71.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 31. Gunderson EP, Hurston SR, Ning X, Lo JC, Crites Y, Walton D, et al. Lactation and progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2015;163:889–98.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 32. Kew S, Ye C, Hanley AJ, Connelly PW, Sermer M, Zinman B, et al. Cardiometabolic implications of postpartum weight changes in the first year after delivery. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1998–2006.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 33. Yoshinari M, Hirakawa Y, Hata J, Higashioka M, Honda T, Yoshida D, et al. Comparison of the contributions of impaired beta cell function and insulin resistance to the development of type 2 diabetes in a Japanese community: the Hisayama Study. Diabetologia 2021;64:1775–84.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 34. Ohn JH, Kwak SH, Cho YM, Lim S, Jang HC, Park KS, et al. 10-Year trajectory of β-cell function and insulin sensitivity in the development of type 2 diabetes: a community-based prospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016;4:27–34.ArticlePubMed
  • 35. Lorenzo C, Wagenknecht LE, D’Agostino RB Jr, Rewers MJ, Karter AJ, Haffner SM. Insulin resistance, beta-cell dysfunction, and conversion to type 2 diabetes in a multiethnic population: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes Care 2010;33:67–72.PubMed
  • 36. Kirwan JP, Huston-Presley L, Kalhan SC, Catalano PM. Clinically useful estimates of insulin sensitivity during pregnancy: validation studies in women with normal glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1602–7.PubMed

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Figure
      • 0
      Related articles
      Amelioration of Insulin Resistance after Delivery Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Postpartum Diabetes in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
      Image
      Fig. 1. Cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes according to ∆Matsuda index. ∆Matsuda index was defined as the difference between the initial postpartum Matsuda index and the gestational Matsuda index. Lowest tertiles ranged from –10.9 to –0.9, middle tertile from –0.8 to 1.2, highest tertile ranged from 1.2 to 8.8. Hazard ratio (HR) of postpartum type 2 diabetes are calculated using Cox proportional model including ∆Matsuda index and variables associated with postpartum type 2 diabetes (gestational fasting blood glucose, postpartum BMI, age at birth, familial history of diabetes, parity). CI, confidence interval.

      Fig. 1.

      Amelioration of Insulin Resistance after Delivery Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Postpartum Diabetes in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
      Characteristic Did not develop T2DM (n=288) Progression to T2DM (n=59) P value
      Age at delivery, yr 31.6±4.1 32.1±4.4 0.396
      Body mass index, pregestational, kg/m2 21.9±3.1 24.5±3.5 <0.001
      BMI change, kg/m2 –0.1±1.3 0.0±1.2 0.978
      Parity, n 2.1±1.6 1.9±1.7 0.369
      Exercise 99 (34.4) 25 (41.7) 0.283
      Breastfeeding 102 (35.4) 9 (15.0) 0.002
      100-g OGTT at mid-gestation
       Glucose (fasting), mg/dL 87.9±11.2 100.5±14.1 <0.001
       Glucose (1-hour), mg/dL 185.9±28.4 203.7±36.6 <0.001
       Glucose (2-hour), mg/dL 172.7±27.1 195.8±33.9 <0.001
       Glucose (3-hour), mg/dL 145.6±25.8 165.3±31.8 <0.001
       Insulin (fasting), μIU/mL 8.7±6.8 9.3±3.8 0.023
       Insulin (1-hour), μIU/mL 65.2±49.0 45.9±37.8 0.004
       Insulin (2-hour), μIU/mL 88.1±61.7 64.3±50.8 0.005
       Insulin (3-hour), μIU/mL 75.7±52.2 60.9±38.6 0.033
      75-g OGTT at initial postpartum visit (postpartum 2 months)
       Glucose (fasting), mg/dL 90.2±8.9 121.1±46.2 <0.001
       Glucose (30-minute), mg/dL 154.9±25.7 200.4±57.9 <0.001
       Glucose (60-minute), mg/dL 160.2±36.4 241.5±82.8 <0.001
       Glucose (90-minute), mg/dL 138.4±33.3 231.7±78.2 <0.001
       Glucose (120-minute), mg/dL 122.5±28.4 208.4±86.1 <0.001
       Insulin (fasting), μIU/mL 10.2±5.3 12.0±6.2 0.026
       Insulin (30-minute), μIU/mL 42.3±25.6 32.0±19.1 0.003
       Insulin (60-minute), μIU/mL 52.0±34.5 42.1±24.9 0.035
       Insulin (90-minute), μIU/mL 48.5±33.3 53.8±40.2 0.288
       Insulin (120-minute), μIU/mL 43.4±31.3 53.3±46.5 0.042
      Longitudinal changes in glycemic measures
       Matsuda index
        Antepartum 5.2±2.7 5.0±2.8 0.524
        Postpartum 5.3±2.3 3.9±2.2 <0.001
        P valuea 0.717 0.010
        Mean difference 0.1±3.0 –1.0±3.3 0.011
       HOMA-IR
        Antepartum 1.9±1.1 2.3±1.0 0.002
        Postpartum 2.3±1.3 3.8±3.5 <0.001
        P valuea <0.001 0.003
        Mean difference 0.4±1.4 1.4±3.5 <0.001
       Insulinogenic index
        Antepartum 0.7±1.9 0.4±0.3 0.195
        Postpartum 0.6±0.4 0.3±0.2 <0.001
        P valuea 0.201 0.028
        Mean difference –0.1±1.8 –0.1±0.3 0.872
       HOMA-β
        Antepartum 141.7±98.3 109.6±98.4 0.023
        Postpartum 150.8±112.4 100.7±63.8 0.001
        P valuea 0.288 0.531
        Mean difference 9.1±145.4 –8.9±107.9 0.369
       Disposition index
        Antepartum 2.6±3.3 1.6±1.1 0.023
        Postpartum 2.7±2.3 1.0±1.0 <0.001
        P valuea 0.646 0.002
        Mean difference 0.1±3.9 –0.6±1.3 0.195
      Variable ∆Matsuda index
      		 Total (n=347) P value
      Lowest tertile (n=116) Middle tertile (n=116) Highest tertile (n=115)
      Postpartum T2DM 19 (16.4) 11 (9.5) 2 (1.8) 32 (9.2) 0.001
      Postpartum prediabetes and T2DM 67 (57.8) 52 (44.8) 32 (28.1) 151 (43.6) <0.001
      Variable Univariatea
      		 Multivariateb
      HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
      ∆Matsuda index tertile
       Lowest tertile 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
       Middle tertile 0.72 (0.29–1.79) 0.484 0.52 (0.21–1.33) 0.175
       Highest tertile 0.59 (0.22–1.59) 0.293 0.33 (0.12–0.93) 0.036
      Fasting plasma glucose 1.05 (1.03–1.08) <0.001 1.06 (1.03–1.09) <0.001
      Postpartum body mass index 1.18 (1.06–1.32) <0.001 1.16 (1.03–1.30) 0.015
      Age at birth 0.99 (0.90–1.09) 0.869 0.93 (0.84–1.04) 0.203
      Family history of diabetes 1.00 (0.47–2.17) 0.992 0.98 (0.43–2.19) 0.950
      Parity 0.90 (0.69–1.16) 0.414 0.87 (0.67–1.13) 0.305
      Table 1. Clinical Characteristics and Metabolic Phenotypes according to Development of Postpartum Type 2 Diabetes

      Values are expressed as mean±standard deviation or number (%). ΔMatsuda index was defined as the difference between the initial postpartum Matsuda index and the gestational Matsuda index. P values are for the t test or chi-square test to compare subjects with and without the occurrence of type 2 diabetes.

      T2DM, type 2 diabetes; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-β, homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function.

      Paired t test from antepartum to postpartum values within each group.

      Table 2. Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes at 2 Months Postpartum Visit by ΔMatsuda Index

      Values are expressed as number (%). ΔMatsuda index was defined as the difference between the initial postpartum Matsuda index and the gestational Matsuda index. Lowest tertiles ranged from –10.9 to –1.1, middle tertile from –1.0 to 1.0, highest tertile ranged from 1.0 to 8.5. P values are for the chisquare test to compare the occurrence of postpartum T2DM and combined with postpartum prediabetes across the tertiles.

      T2DM, type 2 diabetes.

      Table 3. Hazard Ratio of Postpartum Type 2 Diabetes by ΔMatsuda Index Tertile and Associated Variables by Cox Analysis

      HR of postpartum type 2 diabetes are calculated using Cox proportional model including ΔMatsuda index and variables associated with postpartum type 2 diabetes. ΔMatsuda index was defined as the difference between the initial postpartum Matsuda index and the gestational Matsuda index. Lowest tertiles ranged from –10.9 to –0.9, middle tertile from –0.8 to 1.2, highest tertile ranged from 1.2 to 8.8.

      HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

      ΔMatsuda index and factors associated with postpartum type 2 diabetes (gestational fasting blood glucose, postpartum body mass index, age at birth, familial history of diabetes, parity) were included in the multivariate Cox model;

      ΔMatsuda index tertile was included as a covariate in addition to factors associated with postpartum type 2 diabetes in the multivariate Cox model.

      Table 1.

      Table 2.

      Table 3.

      Endocrinol Metab : Endocrinology and Metabolism
      © Korean Endocrine Society.
      TOP