INTRODUCTION
Compared with other countries, the incidence rate and prevalence of thyroid cancer are relatively high in South Korea [1]. These high rates are thought to be due to a combination of detection bias, genetic factors, and environmental factors [2,3]. Risk factors include X-radiation, gamma rays, radioactive iodine (I-131), family history of thyroid cancer, and benign thyroid disease have been reported [3].
Dietary iodine intake has also been suggested as a risk factor for thyroid cancer [3]. Iodine is an essential micronutrient and a vital component of the thyroid hormones, thyroxine (T4), and triiodothyronine (T3), that are involved in various biochemical and metabolic pathways throughout the human body [4]. Thyroid hormones maintain homeostasis through the thyroid function feedback loop between the hypothalamus-pituitary axis and the thyroid gland. Even if there is a temporary excess or insufficient intake of iodine, thyroid hormones are in a balanced state. However, both chronic iodine deficiency and excess can lead to thyroid dysfunction by interfering with homeostasis [4-6].
Traditionally, thyroid cancer has been reported in areas where iodine intake was deficient. After iodine intake increased due to the salt iodization and iodine supplementation, the incidence of thyroid cancer, especially papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) increased despite of decrease in the incidence of follicular thyroid cancer [6-8]. In contrast, in some meta-analyses of the association between iodine intake and thyroid cancer have found that higher iodine intake is associated with a lower risk of thyroid cancer [9-11]. Therefore, there is controversy about the relationship between iodine intake and thyroid cancer. The inconsistencies between previous studies could be due to information bias and measurement error in dietary questionnaires, and inaccuracies in data on dietary iodine intake, differences in dietary sources of iodine by ethnicity and country, and differences in the characteristics of the study participants. In addition, considering the complicated link between recent and chronic dietary iodine intake and thyroid function, the inconsistencies between studies could be due to a complex interaction between factors which modify the risk of thyroid cancer [12-14]. However, it is unclear whether a high iodine intake directly induces PTC development, or indirectly contributes to PTC risk through interaction with thyroid hormones.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of iodine intake, measured using urinary iodine concentration (UIC), and thyroid function included thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free T4 and T3 on the risk of PTC and papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). A second objective was to assess whether there was combined effect between UIC and thyroid hormones in determining the risk of PTC and PTMC.
METHODS
Study design and population
This study was a case-control study, and cases were participants in the Thyroid Cancer Longitudinal Study, a prospective study which has been reported in detail previously [15]. We primarily included 3,184 cases with PTC or PTC with follicular variant on histology record. We excluded participants who did not have both blood and urine samples (n=987); with insufficient information in potential confounders (n=1,565); or those for whom were not matched with controls (n=132). Of remained 500 PTC cases, we additionally excluded 54 cases due to hemolysis of the blood samples, or tumor size <5 mm. After these exclusions, there were a total of 446 PTC cases, including 209 participants with PTC (tumor size ≥10 mm) and 237 participants with PTMC (tumor size 5 to <10 mm) (Supplemental Fig. S1).
The controls were individuals aged 20 to 80 years living in four urban regions who undergone a health check-up at regional medical institutions, public health centers, or temporary health check-up sites (e.g., town halls, community service centers). Regardless of the type of center, health check-up protocols were the same. Of 13,688 participants, we excluded those who did not have both blood and urine samples (n=7,810); with insufficient information in confounders (n=3,473); those who had previous cancer history or had taken medication that affects thyroid function for ≥3 months (n=1,598); or participants who were not matched with cases (n=307). Finally, 500 controls were selected (Supplemental Fig. S1). Informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital (IRB Number: 1603-102-750).
Data collection
Cases were enrolled during the preoperative period which in advance to surgery or other treatments, and controls were enrolled at the visit to health check-up center. Information such as demographic variables, dietary intake and other risk factors were collected by trained interviewers using structured questionnaires on enrollment. Blood and urine samples were collected after an 8-hour fast and stored at −70°C deep freezers in 1 mL aliquots. We measured iodine levels (unit: μg/L) using frozen 1 mL urine by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, 7900x, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA); urinary creatinine was measured using Jaffe (C702, Roche, Mannheim, Germany); and serum sodium and potassium were measured using indirect ion selective electrode (ISE, Roche). Serum TSH, free T4, and T3 were measured using electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (E801, Roche).
Stability of urine and serum samples for UIC and thyroid function
In order to check the UIC stability in stored urine samples, UIC was measured in the urine of nine participants after storage for 1, 7, 30, 90, and 180 days. Repeated measures analysis of variance confirmed that there was no difference in UIC level according to the storage duration (P=0.82). Preoperative stored samples from nine PTC cases, their results of the thyroid function were identified in the patients’ medical records. The reliability between thyroid hormone levels identified in medical record and those newly-analyzed in stored frozen serum was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficients: 0.935, 0.876, and 0.812 for free T4, T3, and TSH, respectively).
Statistical analysis
The creatinine-adjusted and unadjusted UICs were classified into three and four groups, respectively: creatinine-adjusted UIC, <85 μg/gCr (deficiency), 85-219 μg/gCr (adequate), and ≥220 μg/gCr (excessive) [16]; unadjusted UIC, <100 μg/L (deficiency), 100-199 μg/L (adequate), 200-299 μg/L (above requirements), and ≥300 μg/L (excessive) [17]. The UIC of 300 μg/L corresponds to iodine intake of 450 μg/day, which corresponds to six cups of plain yogurt, eight cups of milk, and 20 slices of white bread, [13,18,19]. The thyroid function levels of each type of thyroid function indicators were classified into ‘low,’ ‘normal,’ and ‘high’ groups according to ‘Seoul National University Hospital Clinical Lab’ reference range as clinical cutpoints [20] and two groups according to population cutpoints [21]. The population cutpoints were the mean value of each hormone (TSH, 2.16 μIU/mL; free T4, 1.25 ng/dL), derived from data the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013 to 2015 (KNHANES) [21]. Because T3 information was not available from KNHANES, the population cutpoints for T3 were derived from the controls in this study.
The risk of overall PTC including each PTC and PTMC were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. Potential confounders were selected based on being statistically significant in univariate logistic regression with overall PTC or each main explanatory variable (UIC, free T4, T3, and TSH). Additionally, to assess the relationship between PTC and iodine intake, thyroid function graphically, we conducted spline analysis as visualization. We conducted stratified analyses according to sex, body mass index (BMI), and menopausal status among women. Case-only analyses were conducted among overall PTC to assess the association between clinicopathological aggressiveness and UIC and thyroid hormone levels. Three measures of clinicopathological aggressiveness were used: the presence of the BRAF mutation, lymph node metastasis, and extra-thyroidal extension. To assess the combined effect of iodine intake and thyroid function, we made the four combination considering ‘adequate’ and ‘excessive’ creatinine-adjusted UICs and ‘low’ and ‘high’ free T4 or TSH using population cutpoints. To evaluate the performance on PTC discrimination according to explanatory variables, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for three different types of models. Additionally, we assessed the statistical difference between models. Three models were constructed as follows:
Model 1: Function(Y)=β0+β1 (UIC)
Model 2: Function(Y)=β0+β1 (UIC)+β2 (free T4)+β3 (TSH)
Model 3: Function(Y)=β0+β1 (UIC)+β2 (free T4)+β3 (TSH)+β4 (age)+β5 (sex)+β6 (total energy intake)+β7 (education)+β8 (family history of cancer)+β9 (benign thyroid disease)+β10 (dyslipidemia),
All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) or R software version 4.0 (R-Studio, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
RESULTS
The characteristics of the cases of PTC and PTMC and the controls are shown in Table 1. Compared to the controls, patients with PTC or PTMC had higher education levels (both P< 0.001), and a higher prevalence of family history of cancer in PTMC only (P=0.003), dyslipidemia (both P<0.001), and benign thyroid disease (P=0.01, P<0.001). The mean BMI (P=0.01) and the proportion of women who had ever been pregnant were lower in PTC patients than in the control group (P=0.002), and the proportion of postmenopausal women was lower in PTMC patients than in the control group (P=0.02). The distribution of two matching variables (age and sex) were not different between the PTC cases and the controls or between the PTMC cases and the controls.
Table 2 shows the association between case status and UIC. There was a higher prevalence of excessive iodine intake (UIC ≥220 μg/gCr; UIC ≥300 μg/L) in PTC cases and PTMC cases than controls. In addition, insufficient iodine intake (UIC <85 μg/gCr; UIC <100 μg/L) was rare in both the PTC cases and PTMC cases, but little bit higher in the control group. Excessive UIC (≥220 μg/gCr) were associated with high risk of PTMC and PTC (odds ratio [OR], 8.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.64 to 13.87; and OR, 18.13; 95% CI, 8.87 to 37.04, respectively), and the strength of the association was greater for PTC than for PTMC (P-ordinal <0.05). An excessive unadjusted UIC was also associated with an increased risk of PTC and PMTC analyses according to sex, BMI levels and women’s menopausal status (Supplemental Table S1). In spline analysis, a positive association between UIC and PTC risk was observed, supporting the results of excessive UIC (Supplemental Fig. S2A).
Relative to normal levels of free T4, high free T4 levels were associated with a higher risk of PTMC and PTC (population cutpoints: OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 2.01 to 4.41; and OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.36 to 2.87) (Table 3). The strength of the associations was greater using the clinical cutpoint, than the population cutpoint. In the stratified analyses according to sex, BMI, and women’s menopausal status, TSH was positively associated with the PTC risk in females only; and T3 was not associated with PTC or PTMC in males or females (Supplemental Table S2). Graphically, TSH and free T4 showed as U-shaped association with PTC, but the associations were insignificant in those with low levels (Supplemental Fig. S2B, C). In the case of T3 level, it was not significant with PTC in overall level (Supplemental Fig S2D). According to the aggressiveness of PTC in case-only analysis, there was non-significant differences in UICs and thyroid function were seen between two subgroups (Supplemental Table S3).
The combination of excessive UIC and a high free T4 level was associated with a considerably greater increase in OR of PTC and PTMC than the risk associated with either excessive UIC or a high free T4 level alone (Table 4). The combined effect of excessive UIC and high free T4 levels on risk was more marked for PTC than for PTMC. These suggested that excessive UIC and high free T4 had a synergistic effect. Likewise, the combination of adequate UIC and a TSH level, the risk of PTC was moderately high in the case of the combination with high TSH only. Among individuals with excessive UIC, the risk of PTC and PTMC was high regardless of the TSH levels.
Model performance in each logistic regression model according to PTC and PTMC was higher in the model including the creatinine-adjusted UIC and thyroid function (Model 2, PTC, AUC=0.785; PTMC, AUC=0.776) than the model including creatinine-adjusted UIC alone (Model 1, PTC, AUC=0.714; PTMC, AUC=0.688), and the full model showed the highest performance (Model 3, PTC, AUC=0.850; PTMC, AUC=−0.858) (Fig. 1). All of the P values for AUC difference between Model 1 and 2, between Model 2 and 3, and between Model 1 and 3 were statistically significant (P<0.01). Models with creatinine-adjusted UICs were not statistically different from those with unadjusted UICs (Supplemental Table S4).
DISCUSSION
In this study, individuals with excessive iodine intake had a considerably higher risk of PTC and PTMC than individuals with adequate iodine intake. High free T4 levels were also associated with an increased risk of PTC and PTMC. Excessive UIC had a more marked effect on increasing the risk of PTC than that of PTMC, whereas a high free T4 had a more marked effect on increasing the risk of PTMC than that of PTC. The combined effect of excessive iodine intake and a high free T4 level had a synergistic effect on increasing the risk of PTC and PTMC; whereas in the combination of iodine intake and TSH, a rapid increase in the risk of PTC and PTMC was observed at excessive iodine intake.
Previous results on the association between dietary iodine intake and thyroid cancer have been difficult to interpret because of inconsistencies between studies due to factors such as differences in measurement methods and measurement bias in measuring iodine intake [22,23]. Measurement of 24-hour UIC is the gold standard for assessing iodine intake, but it is not easy to apply at the population level [24]. Therefore, UIC from a random spot urine has been suggested as an alternative indicator [17,24]. Even though UIC varies depended on dietary iodine intake, including ionized water drinking, it has been using as a surrogate marker at the population [17,24].
Many previous studies have assessed the association between thyroid cancer and UIC, but some studies have focused on the median difference in UIC between cases and controls [25,26]. Although a meta-analysis reported the ORs for PTC relative to normal controls associated with excessive iodine intake [27], we could not directly compare their results with our study for the following reasons: two studies published in Chinese could not identify the method; for another study, the OR reported in the meta-analysis was not reported in the original article [27]; and the fourth study used a UIC reference value that differed from World Health Organization (WHO) standards [27]. In one study the PTC risk associated with an excessive UIC did not differ significantly between cases and controls [28]. In addition, four studies used patients with thyroid nodules as the control group and may have underestimated the effect of UIC on the risk of PTC because iodine and thyroid hormones are involved in thyroid growth and differentiation [28-31].
As in our study, some previous studies have reported the effect of excessive UIC on the clinicopathological aggressiveness of PTC, but their results were inconsistent. Some studies found a relationship between excessive iodine intake and an increased risk of lymph node metastasis [30], larger tumor size [32], capsular invasion [31,32], bilateral location [30], extra-thyroid metastasis [31] and BRAF V600E or T17799A mutation [33,34], while other studies have not found an association between excessive iodine intake and lymph node metastasis [31,32], tumor size [31,33], multifocal tumors or bilaterality [31,32], extracapsular extension [32] or BRAF mutations [26].
In the case of thyroid function and PTC risk, high free T4 level was associated with PTC and PTMC. Similar as the result, previous study reported that high free T4 level was associated with thyroid cancer. In the case of TSH level, thyroid cancer was associated in moderate TSH level, but it was difficult to identify whether thyroid cancer was pathologically PTC or not [14]. Additionally, several studies considered thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) and thyroglobulin antibody (TGAb) with TSH and thyroid hormone [14,28,33,35]. We identified synergistic effect between excessive iodine intake and high free T4 levels and an increased risk of PTC and PTMC. However, we could not identify any previous studies that have considered the combined effect of excessive iodine intake and thyroid function on the risk of PTC.
There are possible biological mechanisms that could explain a relationship between excessive iodine intake and high thyroid hormone levels in increasing the risk of PTC. An in vitro study found that thyroid hormone directly contributes to plasma membrane-initiated activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade, thereby participating in thyroid cancer cell proliferation [36]. In addition, TPOAb and TGAb have been shown to be associated with a significantly increased risk of PTC [35]. This suggested an autoimmune pathogenesis associated with excessive iodine intake [35]; however, the association between the presence of autoantibodies and the risk of PTC had been inconsistent in previous studies [14,29,35]. In the case of TSH, both deficient or excessive iodine intake can increase TSH levels and affect PTC progression [37]. In this process, TSH stimulates thyroid cells, leading to genetic changes and cell proliferation [37]. In the case of low iodine diet, type 1 iodothyronine deiodinase levels increase in the thyroid, leading to TSH stimulation, and an increase in type 2 deiodinase activity in the thyroid [38]. However, excessive iodine intake inhibits pituitary type 2 deiodinase activity, leading to an increase in serum TSH [39]. It has been explained that abnormal iodine intake can lead to thyroid dysfunction by interfering with homeostasis [4-6].
This study has some limitations. First, we did not consider nutritional supplements as additional iodine intake [8]. Second, TPOAb and TGAb were not assessed, so we did not have data on thyroid autoimmunity. Additionally, a single UIC measurement might not consider dietary change. However, a previous study based on KNHANES found that individual dietary changes in iodine intake tend to vary less than that of other nutrients such as high-fat or sugar-based foods. Most foods that serve as iodine sources are served as side dishes rather than as the main dish [40]. Although rare cases were observed in the group with insufficient UIC and low hormone levels (clinical cut), the possibility of bias could be excluded because our results were consistent with those in the ordinal logistic regression analysis, suggested as a correction method for sparse data bias [41]. In addition, since our data was loose matching, we used an unconditional logistic regression model for analysis, which is unlikely to be biased [42,43]. Nevertheless, in the analyses for the combined effect of UIC and hormones, since sparse cases were used as a reference group and many covariates were used in the models, there was a possibility of variance inflation. The combined effect of UIC and hormones for the risk of PTC will need to be verified in a larger study in the future.
Despite the limitations, this study also has several strengths. We considered several pathological aggressiveness and the combined effects of thyroid function and iodine intake on PTC and PTMC. Additionally, the overall similarities in the PTC and PTMC results suggests that there is continuity of risk of both PTMC and PTC associated with excessive UIC. Since a lot of eating habits can act as a confounding variable in the association between high iodine intake and thyroid cancer, personal total calorie intake was controlled for all statistical models analyzing the association with iodine intake [12]. We measured UIC by ICP-MS, the gold standard method of UIC, and used creatinine-adjusted UIC as the main explanatory variable to compensate for variations in dietary intake and excretion [44]. Previous studies have shown that creatinine-adjusted UIC is a better indicator the unadjusted UIC because it is less prone to variability and have provided evidence supporting the validity and reliability of creatinine-adjusted UIC [45,46]. We also reported the unadjusted UIC results due to their general use in the interpretation of WHO standards.
In the conclusion, this study identified an association between excessive iodine intake and PTC and PTMC. Moreover, we assessed combined effect on PTC and PTMC from iodine intake and thyroid hormones using creatinine-adjusted UIC measured using ICP-MS which is the gold standard measurement method. Considered the effect of iodine intake and thyroid function, this study suggests the it is important to consider the combined effect of iodine intake and thyroid function in order to assess the risk of PTC and PTMC.
Supplementary Information
Supplemental Table S1.
UIC Except Insufficient Group for the Risk of PTC and PTMC According to Sex, BMI Levels, and Women’s Menopausal Status Based on Exclusion of Insufficient Iodine Intake
Supplemental Table S2.
Thyroid Function Except Clinically Low Group for the Risk of PTC and PTMC According to Sex, BMI Levels, and Women’s Menopausal Status Based on Exclusion of Clinically Low Thyroid Function Level
Supplemental Table S3.
UIC and Thyroid Function for the Likelihood of Aggressive Overall PTCa in Case-Only Study
Supplemental Table S4.
Risk Factors Related to the Risk PTC and PTMC and the Performance (AUC)a in Each Logistic Regression Model
Supplemental Fig. S1.
Flow chart of study population selection. PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; T-CALOS, Thyroid Cancer Longitudinal Study; PTMC, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.
Supplemental Fig. S2.
Spline graphs for thyroid cancer according to various components. (A) Urinary iodine concentration (log-transformed), (B) thyroid stimulation hormone (TSH) level, (C) free thyroxine (T4) hormone level, (D) total triiodothyronine (T3) hormone level. The bold line represents the odds ratio (OR) between components and thyroid cancer. The dotted line represents its 95% confidence interval (CI).
PDF Links
PubReader
ePub Link
Full text via DOI
Download Citation
CrossRef TDM
Supplement1
Print
